English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 51931/87076 (60%)
Visitors : 8495357      Online Users : 149
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/94581

    Title: 高壓與常壓薄膜生物處理反應槽操作於不同污泥停留時間下透膜壓力之比較
    Other Titles: Comparison of TMP in elevated and ambient pressure membrane bioreactors under various SRT
    Authors: 陳翊君;Chen, Yi-Jyun
    Contributors: 淡江大學水資源及環境工程學系碩士班
    李奇旺;Li, Chi-Wang
    Keywords: 薄膜處理程序;薄膜阻塞;透膜壓力;溶氧;汙泥停留時間;有機負荷;溶解性微生物產物;胞外聚合物;MBR;fouling;TMP;DO;SRT;COD loading;SMP;EPS
    Date: 2013
    Issue Date: 2014-01-23 14:47:30 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: MBR為薄膜分離機制與生物處理的結合,具處理水質佳、佔地面積小、汙泥產量少等優點。但薄膜阻塞一直是MBR程序最大問題。在固定的通量操作下,隨過濾時間增長而薄膜開始阻塞,導致TMP上升,若薄膜阻塞情形太嚴重會減短薄膜的使用壽命並提高操作成本。
    文獻指出提高DO可降低薄膜阻塞,故本實驗利用加壓的方式,以3kg/cm2壓力提高密閉MBR反應槽的DO濃度,並設置常壓MBR反應槽做比對。於固定通量下,自反應槽中將固定量之汙泥廢置控制汙泥齡於60 day、5 day、15 day、15 day(實驗編號分別為D-1、D-2、D-3、D-4),之間的差異在於常壓MBR反應槽的掃流量控制,前三者為連續式,後者為間歇式。
    Membrane bioreactor combines physical mechanism of membrane separation and biological treatment. Compared to conventional biological treatment process, MBR has many benefits like a better treated water quality, a smaller footprint, less sludge production. However, MBR process is plagued by membrane fouling. Membrane fouling gets worse with progress of filtration, causing increase of TMP under a fixed flux condition. If the membrane fouling is too serious, then the life of the membrane will be shortened and as a result operating costs will increase.
    According to literature, high DO level can reduce membrane fouling. In this study, high DO was achieved by operating MBR at elevated pressure of 3 kg/cm2 in confined reactor, and a MBR at ambient pressure was operated side by side for comparison purpose. Pre-determined amount of sludge was wasted from bioreactor to maintain SRT of 60 days, 5 days, 15 days, and 15 days, respectively. These experiments are denoted, respectively, as D-1, D-2, D-3 and D-4. The difference between D-3 and D-4 is aeration flow for membrane fouling control. The former has continuous aeration flow, while the latter has intermittent aeration flow.
    This study explores effects of SMP and EPS in elevated and ambient pressure MBR on membrane fouling, and effects of continuous or intermittent aeration flow for controlling membrane fouling. Experimental results show that the concentration of SMP-PN and EPS-PN changed insignificantly with SRT; however the concentration of SMP-PS and EPS-PS decreased with increases of the SRT. Results show that TMP rising, i.e., membrane fouling, is faster for MBR operated at the ambient pressure than at the elevated pressure for experiment D-1, D-2, and D-3. One the other hand, TMP rising is comparable for both systems, indicating that intermittent aeration flow can mitigate membrane fouling.
    Appears in Collections:[水資源及環境工程學系暨研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback