English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 50123/85142 (59%)
Visitors : 7906207      Online Users : 35
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/94183


    Title: IFRS趨同前後績效指標價值攸關性之變化 : 以中國為例
    Other Titles: Change of value relevance of performance measures after convergence with IFRSs : evidence from China
    Authors: 林婉菁;Lin, Wan-Ching
    Contributors: 淡江大學會計學系碩士班
    顏信輝
    Keywords: 中國;新企業會計準則;績效指標;價值攸關性;China;New china accounting standards;Performance Measure;value relevance
    Date: 2013
    Issue Date: 2014-01-23 14:07:00 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 中國於2007年1月1日起即實施與IFRSs趨同的新企業會計準則,故本研究以中國上海及深圳證券交易所A股上市公司為研究對象,分別從相對及增額價值攸關性之角度,探討新企業會計準則之實施,對財務報表績效指標價值攸關性之影響。實證結果(1) 實施與IFRSs趨同之新準則並未增加中國綜合損益表中各績效指標之資訊內涵,並反而使得稅前利潤(IBTAX)、稅後淨利(NI)及綜合損益(TCI)之相對價值攸關性下降。(2)增額價值攸關性部分顯示各績效指標在實施新準則前後均未具顯著差異。故整體對投資者而言,中國資本市場依新準則所編製之綜合損益表之資訊內涵,並未較舊準則高。(3)在新準則實施前後,其績效指標之價值攸關性在外資及法人持股比例高低之企業間不具顯著差異。(4)外資及法人持股比例高組之投資者認為綜合損益(TCI)所擁有之資訊內涵較實施前降低。外資及法人持股比例低組之投資者認為新準則實施之後,各績效指標所擁有之資訊內涵與實施前無顯著差異。(5)多變量分析之結果顯示中國新準則實施後,規模較大的企業,其營業利潤(OPINC)、稅後淨利(NI)及綜合損益(TCI)之相對價值攸關性較新準則實施前及規模較小的企業為低。而增額價值攸關性的部分,顯示中國新準則實施後,規模較大的企業,其稅前息前折舊及攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)之增額價值攸關性較新準則實施前及規模較小的企業為低。而單變量分析之結果顯示在新準則實施前後,稅前息前折舊及攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)、營業利潤(OPINC)、稅後淨利(NI) 及綜合損益(TCI)指標之價值攸關性在公司規模大及小兩組間具顯著差異。
    In January 1th, 2007, China implemented the New China Accounting Standards (NEWCAS) which converged with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs).Therefore, this paper aims to examine the change of value relevance of performance measures before/after implementing the NEWCAS from the relative/ incremental view by using the sample of Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchange A-share listed companies in China. This study finds that(1)The relative value relevance of income before income tax(IBTAX), net income(NI) and total comprehensive income(TCI) were decreased after implementing the NEWCAS. (2) The incremental value relevance doesn’t have significanct difference after implementing the NEWCAS. In general, relative to old China accounting standards, NEWCAS didn’t bring more information to investor.(3)Before/after NEWCAS, the value relevance of performance measures between the company in foreign investment and institutional investor’s shareholding rate high/low group doesn’t have statistically significant difference.(4)The investor in high foreign investment and institutional investor’s shareholding rate group think the information content of total comprehensive income(TCI) were decreased after implementing the NEWCAS. The investor in low rate group think the information content doesn’t have significanct difference after implementing the NEWCAS.(5)In multivariate analysis, after NEWCAS, the value relevance of operating income(OPINC), net income(NI) and total comprehensive income(TCI) in large size company are lower than before NEWCAS and small size company. In univariate analysis, before/after NEWCAS, the value relevance of earnings brfore interest, income tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) ,operating income(OPINC), net income(NI) and total comprehensive income(TCI) between the company in large/small size have statistically significant difference.
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系暨研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML190View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback