English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 49378/84106 (59%)
Visitors : 7372901      Online Users : 80
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/93631


    Title: 兩岸國中歷史教科書關於中華民國史(1911年-1936年)之比較分析
    Other Titles: Cross-strait in history textbooks on the history of the Republic of China (1911-1936) comparative analysis
    Authors: 邵啟峰;Shao, Ch-Feng
    Contributors: 淡江大學中國大陸研究所碩士班
    楊景堯;Yang, Ching-Yao
    Keywords: 後現代主義;歷史教科書;Postmodernism;History textbooks
    Date: 2013
    Issue Date: 2014-01-23 13:20:57 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 中國大陸歡慶孫中山先生辛亥革命百年活動,而台灣在去年2011年慶祝「建國百年」,從上述同一個時間點來看,兩岸的歷史解讀是不同的。台灣的國民教育歷史教科書過去受限於「國民黨史」的特殊時空背景,戒嚴時期的威權時代,許多史實並沒有說真話,當然也不能根據稗官野史來修改教科書。中國大陸出版的「中華民國史」,其中一定會有中國大陸的政治思維,但是也提供台灣的教科書編寫者非常重要的參考。也因為如此,歷史教科書所教導我們的內容,而不是只是維持中國國民黨過去的基調,對於國民黨與共產黨一同參與的中國近現代史,重新解構再建構。換句話說,執政者就擁有歷史解釋權,這是無庸置疑的。
    因為國民教育的歷史教科書不能隨著政黨輪替而一再改變。過去以「國民黨史」當成「中華民國現代史」的教科書必須走入歷史。
    研究結果發現由於兩岸史觀的不同,中國大陸是以馬克思唯物主義的史觀,來描述歷史,就如同在兩岸教科書的文字描述上,兩者的不一樣。各自對於中華民國史的詮釋也不一樣,除了受到意識形態的影響外,後現代主義者的觀點,由於對象的不同,會有不一樣敘述的角度與想法。
    Sun Yat-sen Chinese Revolution Centennial Celebration Events, and Taiwan last year in 2011 to celebrate "Centennial", from the point of view the same time, the two sides are different historical interpretation. Taiwan''s National Education history textbooks in the past limited to "KMT history" special space-time background, martial law era of authoritarian era, many facts are not telling the truth, of course, can not be modified according to anecdotes textbooks. Published in mainland China "ROC history", in which there will be political thinking in mainland China, but Taiwan''s textbook writers to provide a very important reference. Because of this, history textbooks taught our content, not just to maintain the tone of the Chinese Kuomintang in the past, together with the Kuomintang and the Communist Party of China in modern history, deconstructed and then re-constructed. In other words, those in power will have a history of interpretation, it is beyond doubt.
    Because of national education history textbooks can not be changed with the political parties in power and again. Past, "KMT history" as "Republic of China Modern History" textbooks must become history.
    The results showed that the two sides view of history, the Chinese mainland is the Marxist materialist view of history, to describe the history, just as described in the text on both sides of the textbook, the two are not the same. For the interpretation of the history of each ROC is not the same, in addition to being ideological influence, the postmodernist perspective, because different objects, there will be a different narrative perspective and ideas.
    Appears in Collections:[中國大陸研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML116View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback