English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 49433/84396 (59%)
Visitors : 7462572      Online Users : 58
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/92047

    Title: Investment under uncertainty - A case study of cosmetic firms
    Authors: Liao, Shu-hsien;Ho, Shiu-Hwei
    Contributors: 淡江大學管理科學學系
    Keywords: Investment;Uncertainty;Flexibility;Real options
    Date: 2011-05
    Issue Date: 2013-08-12 16:13:06 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: Tamsui, Taipei: Tamkang University, Department of Management Sciences and Decision Making
    Abstract: The purpose of the study is to propose a model that based on the real options analysis for dealing with the entry-exit strategies of cosmetic GMP certification. The optimal thresholds are obtained from the model with uncertain revenue of the firm. According to the optimal entry and exit thresholds, the cosmetic firms can determine to enter into or to withdraw from the GMP certification. The GMP certification is an investment for the firms. Traditionally, the investments are evaluated by capital budgeting methods such as net present value (NPV) method or internal rate of return (IRR) method. However, the traditional methods are based on some unrealistic assumptions. For example, the cash flows of the project are generated with a certain scenario and the project are now exercised without any deferring flexibility. As a result, the traditional capital budgeting methods can not reveal the whole value of the project. Therefore, in order to show the entire value of the project, this paper adopts the real options approach to evaluate the project of cosmetic GMP certification. In addition, we compare the differences between the risk-adjusted net present value method and real options approach in their evaluation results.
    Relation: Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference in Management Sciences and Decision Making=2011年管理科學與經營決策國際學術研討會論文集, pp.71-80
    Appears in Collections:[管理科學學系暨研究所] 會議論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback