English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 49378/84106 (59%)
Visitors : 7383060      Online Users : 40
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/90440


    Title: 基於訊息理論之液化機率與損害評估模式建立與應用
    Other Titles: Establishment and Application of the Evaluation Model for the Liquefaction Probability and Associated Damages Based on the Information Theory
    Authors: 黃富國
    Contributors: 淡江大學水資源及環境工程學系
    Keywords: 土壤液化;邏輯迴歸;機率;訊息理論;soil liquefaction;logistic regression;probability;information theory
    Date: 2008-09
    Issue Date: 2013-06-21 09:16:32 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 臺北市:中國土木水利工程學會
    Abstract: 本篇論文利用邏輯迴歸分析結果及訊息理論(information theory),推導了一新的SPT-N液化評估準則,及液化機率與損害評估模式。文中首先利用Seed形式、T-Y形式及NJRA形式之邏輯迴歸分析結果,藉由訊息理論,評估不同邏輯迴歸模式之可信度及相對權重,建立以三形式液化機率等值線(對應於最大綜合預測成功率)之權重平均為抗液化強度曲線(CRR)之SPT-N液化評估準則,簡稱為MaxSRP法。該法綜合預測成功率達87%,整體表現較現行國內常用之簡化法要好,且兼具簡潔與較大適用範圍之特點(可適用於(N1)60, cs>30之範圍),並搭配抗液化安全係數FS對應之液化機率P(下標 L)、土壤參數折減係數D(下標 E),以及液化潛能指數IL與液化損害程度之推估方法及評量方式,整個流程前後連貫且一致,並反映了九二一地震之本土液化震害經驗,對液化損害評估及抗液化工程設計提供了一具機率意涵之量化工具。最後,本文也繪製了一以機率為基準之地盤改良設計圖表,可作為抗液化工程設計依循之參考。
    In this paper, a new SPT-based simplified method, MaxSRP, for assessing the liquefaction potential, probability and associated damages is established. The assessment model is developed using the method of information theory and the results of logistic regression. The performance of the model is better than that of other simplified methods such as Seed method because of the higher success rate of prediction (87%), wider range of application, consistency of evaluation process for damages evaluation, and inclusion of the experiences from the 921 Chi-Chi earthquake. In this model, relationships between the calculated factors of safety (FS) and probability of liquefaction (P(subscript L)) are calibrated using the logistic mapping approach and Bayesian mapping approach. Damage indices, including reduction factor of soil (D(subscript E)), liquefaction potential index (I(subscript L)), are also revised and proposed for the new simplified method. A design chart for soil improvement based on liquefaction probability is also prepared. The newly developed model provides a method to assess liquefaction probability by factors of safety easily, and forms a basis for risk-based evaluation of liquefaction potential and damages quantitatively and consistently. Applying these concepts and results can be beneficial for the engineering community.
    Relation: 中國土木水利工程學刊=Journal of the Chinese Institute of Civil & Hydraulic Engineering 20(3),頁301-314
    Appears in Collections:[水資源及環境工程學系暨研究所] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML137View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback