English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 49432/84393 (59%)
Visitors : 7453756      Online Users : 73
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/87844

    Title: 以LES模擬圓頂屋蓋結構在平滑逼近流場中的氣動力特性
    Other Titles: LES simulation of aerodynamic characteristic of hemispherical dome in smooth approaching flow
    Authors: 劉皓汝;Liu, Hao-Ju
    Contributors: 淡江大學土木工程學系碩士班
    鄭啟明;Cheng, Chii-Ming
    Keywords: 大跨度;半球;數值模擬;Hemi-spherical dome;Aerodynamics;LES;CFD
    Date: 2013
    Issue Date: 2013-04-13 11:47:58 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 近年來建築設計不只往高度上發展,同時也追求跨度的延展,隨著建築技術進步與材料強度的提升,屋蓋的跨度由數十米發展為數百米,重量也由每平方公尺減少至幾十公斤的薄膜結構。而設計此類大跨度屋蓋結構,風的載重是影響其安全性與舒適度的重要考量之一,本研究即以計算流體力學模擬大跨度圓頂屋蓋在平滑流場中受風特性,並與文獻之風洞實驗結果比較。
    本研究內容分為兩部分:第一部份為網格選定,在嘗試幾種不同計算域切割與網格繪製後,做一個簡單的初步試算,與實驗結果比較,選定一套網格後加密模型周圍計算域後,進行第二部分模擬。第二部分為半球在Re=6.6×104和Re=2×106兩個雷諾數流場受風模擬,每個雷諾數在計算域入流5D的地面又分為兩種不同邊界條件設定:可滑動界面(slip wall)和不可滑動界面(non-slip wall)。
    This study uses LES to simulate the aerodynamic characteristics of hemispherical dome in a smooth approaching flow field. The accuracy of numerical simulation was verified firstly by comparing with the wind tunnel measurements. Then the details of the aerodynamics of the dome were presented in this thesis. Prior to study the dome aerodynamics, several schemes of the grid system and numerical parameters were examined to determine the optimal ones for this study. The numerical simulation in this thesis can be categorized into two parts: the aerodynamics of dome in two Reynolds numbers, Re=6.6×104 and 2×106.
    In the case of Re=6.6×104, the mean and RMS pressure coefficients on the center meridian are noticeably deviated from experiment data. The numerical error may be caused by two reasons. The first probable source of error is that the separation bubble in the wake region extent beyond the mesh refined area. The second one is more subtle. At subcritical Reynolds number, the boundary layer developed over the dome surface is of laminar nature; it transits to become turbulent flow after separated from dome surface. Whether the basic setting of CFD tool, ANSYS-FLUENT, is apt to such a complex numerical simulation is to be confirmed.
    As for the second case, Re=2×106, the mean and RMS pressure coefficients on the center meridian agree well with experiment data except near the front stagnation area. The power spectral densities of the numerical simulated pressure fluctuations also agree with wind tunnel measurements satisfactory. Only the probability densities of the numerical simulation exhibit deviations from the wind tunnel data. It indicates that although the current numerical simulation scheme can reproduce the hemi-spherical dome’s aerodynamic quite well; it is still insufficient to generate the small scale turbulence that contributes to the pressure peaks. The lift force spectrum exhibits multiple peaks; which indicate the complexity of the vortex shedding in the horizontal plane. The time history of the vorticity further demonstrate that there exists no clear interaction between two separated free shear layers of the two opposite side of the dome; however, the wake flow show rather periodic sway synchronized with the variation of lift force coefficient.
    Appears in Collections:[土木工程學系暨研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback