English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 51931/87076 (60%)
Visitors : 8491078      Online Users : 220
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/87612

    Title: 作業基礎成本制應用於政府作業基金之研究 : 以國軍某生產工廠為例
    Other Titles: The application of activity based costing to a government operation fund : an example of a military manufacturing factory
    Authors: 林啟聖;Lin, Chi-Sheng
    Contributors: 淡江大學會計學系碩士在職專班
    Keywords: 作業基礎成本制;作業基金;國軍生產工廠;Activity-based costing;operational fund;Military Manufacturing Factory
    Date: 2013
    Issue Date: 2013-04-13 11:29:01 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 國軍生產工廠之會計處理,係以全部成本法為主體架構,除了採分批及分步混合成本制做為基本成本制度外,並採用正常成本法透過預計分攤率計算產品成本;由於此法係以單一成本分攤基礎將製造費用分攤至成本標的,具有成本交互補貼、成本資訊的產生為時太晚,無益於作業控制等缺點,以致於各廠在籌編次年度預算或調整產品售價或因時效急迫需臨時報價時,無法適時提供有用資訊供決策單位參考,致國防預算潛藏效益不彰之風險。
    The accounting treatment used in the defense manufacturing plants takes full costing as the major frame, in which the job order costing and process costing are adopted as the basic cost systems, while the normal costing is also used to calculate product costs via budgeted rate. However, since the method uses single basis of allocation to allocate the manufacturing expenses into the cost object, it has its disadvantages like delays in producing cost cross subvention and cost information, unfavorable to operation control. Consequently, when preparing the annual budget for the following year, adjusting the product price, or quoting prices temporarily due to time constraints, the plants can’t provide available information for reference to decision-making units, creating potential risks for the national defense budgets of having very little benefits.
    The efficiency of the implemented ABC system can be shown in Cost Control and Analysis of Profit; however, the previous literatures exploring the Military Industries and Services Revolving Fund (MISRF) based on activity based costing fail to consider the framework of financial statements and the manpower structure of individual cases, which only takes the expense of the case plant in the current period as a part of the manufacturing costs but does not include the salaries of military staff. Thus, incorrect results may be obtained by such researches.
    By taking an ordnance factory undertaking production as the research subject, this paper not only lists the salaries of military staff into discussion and excludes the expense in the current period, but also introduces the ABC system in line with the actual production processes, so as to compare the differences between the new and old cost systems, and put forward the reviews and suggestions for the case plant and its production.
    The main findings of this paper include:
    1.While calculating the profits and losses with full costing, the period cost shall be excluded from the scope of activity based costing.
    2.The activity based costing doesn’t reflect the complexity of operation.
    3.The activity based costing doesn’t reflect the capacity of operations that are idle or not used.
    4.Cost cross subsidy will be generated under the existing cost system.
    5.The case plant doesn’t provide timely and objective cost information under the existing cost system.
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系暨研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback