English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 49287/83828 (59%)
Visitors : 7152115      Online Users : 32
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/87094


    Title: 推動國中教師評鑑策略選擇之研究
    Other Titles: Selecting the strategies for implementing teacher evaluation in junior high schools
    Authors: 王鈺欣;Wang, Yu-hsin
    Contributors: 淡江大學教育政策與領導研究所碩士在職專班
    張鈿富;Chang, Dian-fu
    Keywords: 國民中學;教師評鑑;模糊統計;junior high school;Teacher evaluation;fuzzy statistics
    Date: 2012
    Issue Date: 2013-04-13 10:39:16 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究是以模糊問卷進行調查研究,蒐集新北市國中教師對於教師評鑑策略的重要性與可行性的看法,並以模糊統計進行數據轉換,以瞭解推動教師評鑑的可行策略,共發出400份問卷,回收有效問卷321份。
    研究結論如下:
    一、 在教師評鑑目的方面
    可採用的策略依序為「提升教學品質」、「解決不適任教師問題」、「協助教師專業成長」、「決定教師年度成績考核」。
    二、 在教師評鑑原則方面
    可採用的策略依序為「評鑑項目依教師專業領域訂定」、「教師參與評鑑項目的決定」、「評鑑項目依教師專業發展階段訂定」。
    三、 在教師評鑑方法方面
    可採用的策略依序為「採用教學觀察」、「採用教師晤談」、「採用教師自我評鑑」、「採用教學檔案」、「採用學生學習成就」;不適宜的策略為「採用家長問卷」。
    四、 在教師評鑑結果運用方面
    可採用的策略依序為「輔導教師專業成長」、「做為教師續聘依據」;不適宜的策略為「做為教師晉級加薪依據」。
    This study aims to select better strategies for implementing teacher evaluation in junior high schools. Based on the fuzzy questionnaire, this study collected the data from teachers’ perceptions of importance and feasibility in related evaluation strategies. Following the idea of fuzzy statistics, this study transformed the interval data by way of fuzzy means, defuzzification and fuzzy distance.
    The findings of this study are as follows:
    1. For the purposes of teacher evaluation, the possible strategies are "improving the quality of teaching", "solving the problems of unqualied teachers", "assisting teachers in their professional development", and"assessing teachers'' annual performance".
    2. Following the principles of teacher evaluation, the possible strategies includ "the evaluation items are according to teachers'' teaching fields", "teachers participate in the decision making of evaluation", and"the evaluation items followed the stage of teachers'' professional development".
    3. For methods of teacher evaluation, the possible strategies are "classroom teaching observation", " interview teachers"," using teacher self-evaluation", "using teaching portfolio", and “according to student achievement". (The inappropriate strategy is “teachers'' performance is evaluated by parents'' questionnaires”.
    4. How to use the results of teacher evaluation? The possible strategies includ, "promote teachers'' professional development", and"as a way for re-appointing teachers in schools"; The inappropriate strategy is "using the result to make sure how much to pay teachers and their promotion".
    Appears in Collections:[教育政策與領導研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML115View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback