English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 49287/83828 (59%)
Visitors : 7157759      Online Users : 82
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/87002


    Title: 戰略互動論與韓戰的不對稱衝突
    Other Titles: Strategic interaction thesis and the asymmetirc conflict of Korean War
    Authors: 李奕緯;Lee, Yee-Wei
    Contributors: 淡江大學國際事務與戰略研究所碩士班
    周湘華
    Keywords: 不對稱衝突;韓戰;戰略互動論;Asymmetric Conflict;Korean War;Strtegic Interaction Thesis
    Date: 2012
    Issue Date: 2013-04-13 10:34:06 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 戰略研究自古與歷史研究不可分,研究戰略應當從研究戰史入門。在我們所處的時代,發生於1950年6月25日至1953年7月27日的韓戰是一場重要的大規模戰事,它有複雜的面向和許多的啟示可供後人研究,而其中一個最引人入勝的觀察面向,即是這是一場弱小勢力成功對抗強大勢力的典範戰例,亦即一場「不對稱衝突」。

    關於不對稱衝突的研究,美國學者脫夫特(Ivan Arreguín-Toft)發明提出之「戰略互動論」應屬最新最大成果,因為它自稱是解釋所有不對稱衝突現象的一般性理論,那也就正好作為我們研究韓戰這場不對稱衝突的分析工具。

    因此,本文的研究首先聚焦韓戰中聯合國方與共產黨方的不對稱衝突情形,求取符合真實因果的歷史敘事,其次讓韓戰歷史接受戰略互動論的應用分析,觀察韓戰是否符合戰略互動論所提出之假設,而由於應用理論的個案分析必然同時存在解釋個案與檢證理論這兩種功能,所以本文最後的研究便是探索韓戰歷史對戰略互動論所造成的檢證成果,進行戰略互動論作為不對稱衝突一般性理論之正確性的探討。
    Strategic study cannot be separated with history study since ancient times; studying strategy should get start from studying war history. In the times we live, the Korean War, happened in June 25, 1950 to July 27, 1953, is an important large-scale war with complicated faces and a lot of messages. One of the most fascinating face is that, Korean War is a model of weaker power successfully against stronger power, it is an “asymmetric conflict”.

    In studies of asymmetric conflict, the “strategic interaction thesis” invented by American scholar Ivan Arreguín-Toft should be the latest and biggest researching result, because it claimed itself as a general theory to explain all the asymmetric conflict phenomenon, so it also could be the tools for us to analysis the asymmetric conflict of the Korean War.

    Therefore, this study first focused the asymmetric conflict of Korean War, to strike a true causal historical narrative. Followed we make the Korean War history accept the application of strategic interaction thesis analyzing , to observate that Korean War whether conform the hypotheses of the strategic interaction thesis or not. Finally, case analysis by application of the theory must with case explaining and theory testing these two functions, so the end of this article is to explore the testing result made by Korean War to the strategic interaction thesis, to review the correctness of strategic interaction thesis as a general theory.
    Appears in Collections:[國際事務與戰略研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML117View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback