English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 60696/93562 (65%)
Visitors : 1045167      Online Users : 30
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/80334

    Title: How to better reduce confirmation bias? The fit between types of counter-argument and tasks
    Authors: Huang, H.-H.;Parolia, N;Shih, Sheng-Pao
    Contributors: 淡江大學資訊管理學系
    Date: 2010-03
    Issue Date: 2013-01-22 18:03:25 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: Confirmation bias is a driver of problematic decision making. People search information supporting current beliefs and ignore real critical evidence. Counter-argument i.e. providing evidences opposite to preferred beliefs was shown to have an effect on reducing confirmation bias. This study advances past studies by separating counter-arguments into two types and examining their effects in different stock investment contexts. We attempt to show that different types of counter-arguments are needed under different decisional contexts.
    Relation: Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Conference of the Southern Association for Information Systems
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute & Department of Information Management] Proceeding

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback