English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 62805/95882 (66%)
Visitors : 3910775      Online Users : 341
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/79562

    Title: Ranking universities based on performance evaluation by a hybrid MCDM model
    Authors: Wu, Hung-Yi;Chen, Jui-Kuei;Chen, I-Shuo;Zhuo, Hsin-Hui
    Contributors: 淡江大學未來學研究所
    Keywords: University;Performance evaluation;Analytic hierarchy process (AHP);VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR);Multiple-criteria decision making (MCDM)
    Date: 2012-06
    Issue Date: 2012-12-11 21:14:38 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: The aims of this study are to weight the performance evaluation indices for higher education based on the official performance evaluation structure developed by the Taiwan Assessment and Evaluation Association (TWAEA) and to rank 12 private universities listed by the Ministry of Education as a case study. We apply a hybrid multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model to accomplish these objectives. Specifically, we utilize the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to accomplish the first aim, but we adopt the VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) method for the second aim by utilizing the AHP outcome. We also compare the official rankings of the 12 private universities with our ranking of the same universities. Our study endeavors to help universities optimize their performances with efficiency. In addition, the results of this study could provide a reference point for other universities and related educational institutions in their efforts to conduct evaluations, improve their performances and form educational policies.
    Relation: Measurement 45(5), pp.856–880
    DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2012.02.009
    Appears in Collections:[Master's Program, Graduate Institute of Futures Studies] Journal Article

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    Ranking universities based on performance evaluation by a hybrid MCDM model.pdf367KbAdobe PDF1View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback