English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 62805/95882 (66%)
Visitors : 3961808      Online Users : 489
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/77511

    Title: 中共"反介入戰略"中反艦彈道飛彈的能力虛實
    Other Titles: PLA "anti-access strategies" : an analysis of ASBM capabilities
    Authors: 王曉嶸;Wang, Shaou-Lon
    Contributors: 淡江大學國際事務與戰略研究所碩士在職專班
    Keywords: 反介入戰略;反艦彈道飛彈;空海一體戰;Anti-access Strategies;ASBM;Air Sea Battle
    Date: 2012
    Issue Date: 2012-06-21 06:53:25 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 中共「反介入戰略」的產生,主要因1994年10月27日漢級潛艦遭美軍「小鷹號航母戰鬥群」受困於黃海,及1996年台海危機美軍航母戰鬥群的介入干預行動,令中共深感奇恥大辱,力圖尋求「反介入」戰力上的發展。
    有鑑於此,中共即致力於反艦武器的發展,並已獲得初步的成果,美國著名智庫蘭德公司於 2007年3月29日發表的一份研究報告「深入龍穴─中共的反介入戰略及其對美國的影響」中強力警告說:「中共有可能在未來發生的台海衝突中擊敗美國。」這份報告並強調,若台海戰爭一旦開啟,中共可能使用巡弋飛彈與潛艦攻擊美國航空母艦,並以彈道飛彈攻擊美軍。
    The two encounters inspired the existence of Chinese Anti-access, the Han class submarine encounter with the USS Kitty Hawk on Oct 27 1994 and the U.S. carrier battle groups response to the 1996 Taiwan Strait crisis, which were recognized as national embarrassment by the PRC and seeking all chances to strive for “Anti-access” development.
    By that, PLA contributes all efforts on Anti-ship Ballistic Missile and had acquired initial achievement. On Mar 29 2007,the RAND Corporation had announced a report “Entering the Dragon''s Lair: Chinese Antiaccess Strategies and Their Implications for the United States” that strongly indicates “Chinese Antiaccess measures might defeat U.S. military operations in the event of Taiwan Strait conflict”. This report further addressed that PLA might conduct cruise missile and submarine attack against U.S. aircraft carrier, and attacking U.S. forces with TBM.
    U.S. military had adopted ”Air Sea Battle” deployment in order to sustain its predominance in western Pacific, which also includes I. Increase nuclear submarine deployment in Asian Pacific Region. II. Deploy Global Hawk reconnaissance drone. III. Speed up X37B spacecraft development. IV. Increase security level in Ryukyu Islands, Guam and Hawaii military bases. V. Increase B-2" Stealth" bomber deployment in western Pacific. VI. Speed up the construction on Guam as a strategic location for U.S. military, which could be a base for deploying Nuclear-Powered ballistic missile submarine, carrier battle groups, stealth bomber, Aegis cruiser and destroyer, and marine corps.
    Taiwan has to continue the effort in acquiring and developing the latest weapon system to establish resolute defense capability, in order to deter and counter any PLA intrusions meanwhile facing Chinese “Anti-access Strategies”and growth of cruise and ballistic missile capabilities, and U.S. adjusting the military deployment in western Pacific. Taiwanese solidarity in upgrading armament and self-defense determination would be essential in maintaining peace over Taiwan Strait and Asia Pacific region.
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute of International Affairs And Strategic Studies] Thesis

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback