English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 49647/84944 (58%)
Visitors : 7710602      Online Users : 91
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/75355


    Title: Improving Undergraduate Teaching in Taiwan: Examining Perceived Gaps between Faculty and Students
    Authors: 張鈿富;Chang, Dian-fu;Yeh, Chao-chi;Chang, Hsiao-chi
    Contributors: 淡江大學教育政策與領導研究所
    Keywords: Teaching Quality;Service Quality Gap;Higher Education;Teaching Evaluation
    Date: 2011-12-01
    Issue Date: 2012-03-22 00:07:47 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 高等教育評鑑中心基金會;華藝數位股份有限公司
    Abstract: This study applied the Parasuraman, Zeithaml, and Berry (PZB) model to examine the perceived gap of teaching quality between faculty and students in Taiwan. The research data for this study were derived from the 2007-2008 evaluation report of the Ministry of Education (MOE) Teaching Excellence Project. This study transformed the data from faculty and student questionnaires in 28 participating universities. This article presents the gaps between the "importance of teaching quality" and "actual improvement of teaching" in percentiles. Both the t test and the Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detector (CHAID) were used to examine differences in teaching quality. The results show differences for the manner in which faculty and students assess the importance of teaching quality, and actual teaching improvement. Faculty are typically more optimistic with their teaching quality and are more likely to provide a better assessment of their teaching quality than their students are. This study also identified factors that affect gaps in teaching quality, as follows (in order of importance): status (faculty or students), university sector, university scale, and university funding. In conclusion, this study proposes suggestions to improve teaching practices on different campuses.
    Relation: 高教評鑑=Evaluation in Higher Education 5(2),頁1-18
    DOI: 10.6197/EHE.2011.0502.01
    Appears in Collections:[教育政策與領導研究所] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.htmlEmperical data analysis0KbHTML341View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback