English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 57047/90734 (63%)
Visitors : 12475212      Online Users : 160
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/75060

    Title: 審議式民主在台灣實務推動的定位與價值:從公民會議的經驗分析
    Other Titles: The Practical Value and Status of Deliberative Democracy in Taiwan: An Exploratory Case Analysis of Citizen Conference
    Authors: 李仲彬;黃東益
    Contributors: 淡江大學公共行政學系
    Keywords: 審議民主;公民會議;程序民主;實質民主;deliberative democracy;citizen conference;procedural democracy;substantial democracy
    Date: 2011-03
    Issue Date: 2012-03-11 22:52:16 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 臺北市:中華國家競爭力研究學會
    Abstract: 審議民主模式在過去二十年當中,影響了治理過程中政府與民眾之間關係的思維,然而在理論的充分發展之後,實際的審議民主模式操作如何回應到當初審議民主論者所建構的圖像,則是目前文獻較為缺乏。本文目的在透過台灣近幾年公民會議的實際操作經驗,結合公民會議本身與政治系統的運作,找出公民會議在現行制度當中,對實務的定位與價值,並回應理論的期盼。從審議民主論者的角度來看,審議民主模式追求的應該是工具與表意的結合,以及程序民主與實質民主的兼顧。但本文的研究發現,目前台灣所推動的公民會議模式,在定位上偏重工具性,忽略表意性的目的;在價值的追求上,公民會議帶來的是實質上兼顧各方立場的價值,而不是程序上的民主價值。
    Deliberative democracy theory has been extensively discussed in the past two decades. Democracy theorists believe it opportunely responds to the emerging needs of civic engagement in democratic administration. However, even though the theoretical value of deliberative democracy is well-developed, the effect of its practical implementation is still fuzzy. Many ideas concerning on deliberative democracy are criticized on they are merely theoretical and speculative. The purpose of this paper is to clarify the practical value and status of practical implementation of deliberative democracy in Taiwan by examining the policy impacts of eight citizen conferences. The findings show that 1) the implementation of deliberative democracy in Taiwan only brought about instrumental effect, as a means of looking for public opinion and policy support, and ignored the importance of expressive effect which aims to get mutual understanding among citizens; 2) the practical value of deliberative democracy in Taiwan favored only substantive value and neglected procedural equity.
    Relation: 競爭力評論 14,頁51-71
    Appears in Collections:[公共行政學系暨研究所] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback