English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 56379/90243 (62%)
Visitors : 11685332      Online Users : 34
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/74749

    Title: 應用類神經網路於衛星影像淹水辨識之研究
    Other Titles: A study of flood identification in satellite image using artificial neural networks
    Authors: 高毅灃;Kao, I-Feng
    Contributors: 淡江大學水資源及環境工程學系碩士班
    張麗秋;Chang, Li-Chiu
    Keywords: 倒傳遞類神經網路;淹水辨識;衛星影像;合成孔徑雷達;back-propagation neural network;flood extent identification;satellite image;synthetic aperture radar
    Date: 2011
    Issue Date: 2011-12-28 19:25:07 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 臺灣地區易受到颱風暴雨侵襲,常發生水災,且因地形山高河短,淹水過程相當短暫,又受天氣影響,不適合使用飛機或由平流層上方的可見光衛星觀測完整災區,故最適合調查災區淹水區域之手段即為使用可穿透雲層之合成孔徑雷達(SAR)衛星。
    Typhoons and storms hit Taiwan several times each year and they cause serious
    flood disasters. The rivers are short and steep, and their flows are relatively quick
    with floods lasting only few hours. Due to the factors of the weather, it is not suitable
    for aircraft or traditional multispectral satellite; hence, the most appropriate way for
    investigating flood extent is to use Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) satellite.
    In this study, back-propagation neural network (BPNN) model and multivariate
    linear regression (MLR) model are constructed to identify the flood extent from SAR
    satellite images. The input variables of the BPNN model are the pixel’s Radar Cross
    Section (RCS) value and mean, standard deviation, minimum and maximum of RCS
    values among its adjacent 3×3 pixels. The MLR model uses two images, including
    the flooding before and the input variables of the MLR model are the difference
    between the RCS values of two images and the variances among its adjacent 3×3
    The results show that the BPNN model can perform much better than the MLR
    model. The correct percentages are more than 80% and 73% in training and testing
    data, respectively. However, the locations of many misidentified areas are very
    fragmented and unrelated. For correcting the small and fragmented areas,
    morphological operations are used to modify the outputs of these three identification
    models. The modified results have been improved a lot and the correct percentages
    increase up to 90%.
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute & Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering] Thesis

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback