經本論文之方法求得之回歸週期，與現實生活中的規範相比之下，呈現的數值顯得過於嚴謹，未來接續之研究希望以目前數據為參考，以期求得更為符合規範需求之回歸週期。 In addition to security considerations of building, the use of personnel comfort in the structural design, which is caused by wind disturbance in some circumstances, is also an important indicator. With regard to the impact on vibration of building results from the wind, the regulations of comfort, has long been unclear. On account of that besides physical factors, includes many other factors such as psychological factors and so on. The standard of wind comfort criteria in Taiwan now is set of 5 mm / sec² acceleration, with its corresponding return period of six months.
In order to establish local data as a reference for future improvement of wind norms, this study makes use of the vibration simulator at Wind Engineering Research Center in Tamkang University. We set up a methodology and process, so as to achieve comfort threshold and return cycle; on basis of random vibration tests to build up comfort criteria (2%, 5% and 50% against the percentage) and corresponds to the Return Period in comparison with Simple Harmonic Motion.
By the results that: (1) The comfort threshold will change with different motion-frequencies(0~1Hz); (2) The before-and-after direction of Simple Harmonic Motion is more sensitive than the left-and-right direction, but random motion is not obvious.
The resulting value for the Return Period by the method of this paper appears to be too stringent with comparison to the standard of real life. The future continuation of the study wish to use the data as a reference and in the hope of obtaining plans that are more in line with standard requirements of the Return Period.