English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 63246/95943 (66%)
Visitors : 4833992      Online Users : 190
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/74498

    Title: 建築受風水平隨機振動之舒適度評估
    Other Titles: Evaluation of random comfort criteria to wind-induced horizontal vibration of buildings
    Authors: 蔡伯安;Tsai, Po-An
    Contributors: 淡江大學土木工程學系碩士班
    吳重成;Wu, Jong-Cheng
    Keywords: 風致振動;舒適度標準;回歸週期;振動模擬台;Wind-Induced Motion;Random Vibration;Comfort Criteria;Return Period;Motion Simulator
    Date: 2011
    Issue Date: 2011-12-28 18:44:51 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 建築物除了考量安全性之外,在受風擾動之情況之下,其使用人員的舒適度在結構設計裡亦是一個重要的指標。對於建築物受到風力影響所產生的振動,關於其舒適度方面的規範,長久以來一直不明確,因為除了身體因素之外,還包括心理因素等眾多因素影響。而目前台灣風力規範訂定之舒適度標準為5 mm/sec²加速度,其對應之回歸週期為半年。



    In addition to security considerations of building, the use of personnel comfort in the structural design, which is caused by wind disturbance in some circumstances, is also an important indicator. With regard to the impact on vibration of building results from the wind, the regulations of comfort, has long been unclear. On account of that besides physical factors, includes many other factors such as psychological factors and so on. The standard of wind comfort criteria in Taiwan now is set of 5 mm / sec² acceleration, with its corresponding return period of six months.

    In order to establish local data as a reference for future improvement of wind norms, this study makes use of the vibration simulator at Wind Engineering Research Center in Tamkang University. We set up a methodology and process, so as to achieve comfort threshold and return cycle; on basis of random vibration tests to build up comfort criteria (2%, 5% and 50% against the percentage) and corresponds to the Return Period in comparison with Simple Harmonic Motion.

    By the results that:
    (1) The comfort threshold will change with different motion-frequencies(0~1Hz);
    (2) The before-and-after direction of Simple Harmonic Motion is more sensitive than the left-and-right direction, but random motion is not obvious.

    The resulting value for the Return Period by the method of this paper appears to be too stringent with comparison to the standard of real life. The future continuation of the study wish to use the data as a reference and in the hope of obtaining plans that are more in line with standard requirements of the Return Period.
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute & Department of Civil Engineering] Thesis

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback