淡江大學機構典藏:Item 987654321/74378
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 62822/95882 (66%)
造訪人次 : 4014662      線上人數 : 813
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/74378


    題名: 從地方自主性與協力治理觀點論健康城市之發展 : 以淡水鎮為例
    其他題名: A study of the development of healthy city from the viewpoint of local autonomy and collaborative governance : the case study of Tamsui township
    作者: 劉雲瑋;Liu, Yun-Wei
    貢獻者: 淡江大學公共行政學系公共政策碩士班
    陳志瑋
    關鍵詞: 地方自主性;協力合作;公民參與;夥伴關係;Local Autonomy;Partnership;Collaborative Cooperation;Citizen Participation
    日期: 2011
    上傳時間: 2011-12-28 18:27:57 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本文以健康城市作為研究的主軸，並且聚焦於地方自主性與協力治理兩大影響因素，探討健康城市之建構與發展情況，在此以淡水鎮為例。筆者先以檢閱過去有關健康城市研究之文獻，包括WHO對健康城市之定義、準則與期望，透過文獻分析之過程，嘗試解答下列問題：（1）原台北縣淡水鎮在實際推動健康城市過程中，擁有多少自主性可進行策略目標的規劃，進而完成健康城市的策略藍圖？（2）原台北縣淡水鎮在實際推動健康城市過程中，需要哪些內部與外部協力的活動，以達成健康城市的目標？在進行協力合作的過程中，對健康城市的建構產生哪些影響？（3）原台北縣淡水鎮健康城市的規劃與執行過程，受到哪些內在與外在因素的影響，以致形成推動健康城市的障礙？（4）原淡水鎮改制為淡水區之後，健康城市的發展是否受到影響？經分析後，獲致以下結果。首先，五都升格改制後，淡水之地方自主性下降，使淡水健康城市之運作發展呈現原地踏步之景象，此為地方自主性改變之困境。其次，淡水健康城市目前與後續之發展缺乏足夠之財政資源與支持，使財政上面臨之困難成為淡水健康城市現行之困難。第三，淡水健康城市之公民參與配合度高，但相對較缺乏主動挖掘問題之主動式參與，故淡水健康城市至今仍屬較為被動式的公民參與。第四，淡水健康城市之協力合作關係網絡囊括角色各異之參與者，擁有共同目標，但資源有限，使淡水健康城市之運作網絡形成既合作又競爭之夥伴關係。
    The main theme of this research is “the study of healthy city”, and it focuses on the influential factors such as local autonomy and cooperative governance. I reviewed the data of studies in healthy cities, including the definitions, principles, and expectations of healthy city. According to the literature review, this research tries to answer these questions as follows: 1. In the process of setting into action in the former Tamsui township, Taipei County, how much autonomy can map out the strategy objectives to accomplish the strategy map of a healthy city? 2. In the process of setting into action in the former Tamsui township, Taipei County, which of the internal cooperation and external cooperation can accomplish the aim of a healthy city? In the process of cooperating, what are the influences made by the construction of a healthy city? 3. In the process of planning and executing of the former Tamsui township, Taipei County, which of the internal factors and external factors are the influence that is being the barrier of setting a healthy city into action? 4. When the former Tamsui township, Taipei County turn into the Tamsui district, New Taipei City, the development of a healthy city has any change or be affected?
    I got the results after I analyzed my data and they were as follows: 1. After the former Tamsui township, Taipei County turned into the Tamsui district, New Taipei City, the autonomy of Tamsui is decreasing, and the development of Tamsui healthy city seems that soldiers are making the marching movements without moving forwards. 2. The existing and future development of Tamsui healthy city is short of sufficient financial resources and supports that is the existing problem of Tamsui healthy city. 3. Tamsui has high degree of citizen participation ,but it lacks active participation. 4. The cooperative network of Tamsui healthy city has many different participant with mutual aim, but the resources are limited that make the cooperative network of Tamsui healthy city being a co-opetition relationship.
    顯示於類別:[公共行政學系暨研究所] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML171檢視/開啟

    在機構典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

    TAIR相關文章

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - 回饋