English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 62805/95882 (66%)
Visitors : 3931542      Online Users : 464
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/74373

    Title: 臺北市出租國宅及租金補貼政策之分析 : 政策工具選擇途徑
    Other Titles: Study renting public house and rent subsidy policy for low-income households in Taipei City : policy tool choice approach
    Authors: 楊文華;Yang, Wen-hua
    Contributors: 淡江大學公共行政學系公共政策碩士在職專班
    陳恆鈞;Chen, Hen-Chin
    Keywords: 整體住宅政策;出租國宅;租金補貼;政策工具;階層迴歸;Integrated housing policy;renting public house;rent subsidy;Policy tool;hierarchical regression
    Date: 2011
    Issue Date: 2011-12-28 18:26:32 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 都會地區高房價問題成為2009年十大民怨之首,加上房市區域性發展不均衡及房價北熱南冷現象相當明顯,健全都會區房價即成為政府施政的當務之急,惟在政府尚無法有效解決高房價問題前,許多無力購屋者轉以租屋方式暫代自有住宅。
    The problem of unaffordable housing price has been the top public grievance of the society since 2009, as well as the unbalanced of regional development leading to pricing difference between the northern and the southern. Those phenomena make it the priority of governance in Taiwanese government. However, many people who cannot affordable a pricing-high housing tend to be tenanting before the authorities solving the problem.
    “Integrated housing policy” in 2005 shows rental subsidies scheme including two implement aspects: 1. renting public house constructed by government directly and 2.rental subsidy. From “policy tool theory”, these aspects indicate to “Direct Government” and “Grants” separately. For attempting to understand the two types of policy tools could achieve the goal of housing policy, in the meantime adding “people” factor, which is the key valuation factor in “policy tool theory”. The thesis tries to estimate the performance the “effect” and “efficiency” of policy tool by intermediary variables which contain environmental quality, living stability and living quality.
    The objects of the thesis are renting public house tenants and rental subsiding households in Taipei city. The thesis conducted questionnaires by interviewing those households. The hypothesis is that the better environmental quality, living stability and living quality, the more effective and efficient policy tools are. 501 surveys have been conducted randomly with 460 of them being valid. This thesis uses hierarchical regression to prove the hypothesis of the thesis.
    Thesis conclusion:
    1. Renting public house: the higher of the living standard of living quality, the scheme is more effective. The higher of living environment of living quality, the scheme is more efficient. The higher of landlord trustiness of living stability, the scheme is more effective and efficient. The higher of the living cost of living quality, the scheme is more effective.
    2. Rent subsidy: the higher of the target group of living stability, the scheme is more efficient. The higher of the living cost of living quality, the scheme is more effective.
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute & Department of Public Administration] Thesis

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback