English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 49287/83828 (59%)
Visitors : 7158385      Online Users : 84
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/74241


    Title: 臺灣公教人員保險基金的績效分析與投資政策之探討
    Other Titles: Analysis of the public servants insurance fund performance and its investment policy
    台灣公教人員保險基金的績效分析與投資政策之探討
    Authors: 邱薇羽;Chiu, Wei-Yu
    Contributors: 淡江大學管理科學研究所碩士班
    陳登源;Chen, Ding-Yuan
    Keywords: 公教人員保險基金;資產配置;投資政策;擇時策略;證券選擇策略;市場實際報酬率;Public Servants Insurance Fund;Asset Allocation;investment policy;Market timing;Security Selection;Market Return
    Date: 2011
    Issue Date: 2011-12-28 18:17:55 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 台灣公教人員保險基金的資產配置一直是的一項重要課題。隨著基金規模持續不斷成長,其運用日益重要。本研究期間為2004年1月1日至2010年12月31日共七筆月資料,以Brinson, Hood and Beebower(1986)所提出之架構,稱之為BHB模式。並使用市場實際報酬率取代投資政策報酬率,將市場實際報酬率稱為benchmark,在本研究中該模式稱為修正的BHB模式。兩種模式下對準備金進行歸因分析與解釋能力分析之研究結果為不論採用何種模型,積極投資活動不一定能提供正貢獻。在使用修訂的BHB模式下,投資政策對實際投資組合報酬無解釋能力,顯示出良好的經濟預測能力以及審慎的擬訂投資政策具重要性。
    Asset allocation of public servants insurance fund has been an affective issue of management in Taiwan. With the Fund size continuously grows, its investment has become increasingly important. The data periods are between 2004/1/1 ~ 2010/12/31 and there are seven using yearly data. Based Brinson, Hood and Beebower framework proposed by 1986 which called BHB model in the study. We use market return to trace the policy return which called it benchmark. Based the BHB model and used benchmark we called it modified BHB model in the study. Public servants insurance fund were used to attribution it investment performance to each of a number of decisions and employed regression analysis under the two models. The analysis results to whatever the model used, active investment activities may not be able to provide positive contributions. Our analysis shows that investment policy explains 0 percent of the variability of actual portfolio return in the modified BHB model, indicating a accurate predictive power of economic development and prudent investment policy are important.
    Appears in Collections:[管理科學學系暨研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML88View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback