English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 49287/83828 (59%)
Visitors : 7147791      Online Users : 70
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/74197


    Title: 應用二維權力方法探討金酒公司通路權力之研究
    Other Titles: Using bivariate power approach to explore the channel power of Kinmen Kaoliang Liquor Incorporated
    Authors: 陳滄江;Chen, Tsang-Chaing
    Contributors: 淡江大學管理科學研究所博士班
    李培齊
    Keywords: 強制權;專家權;親和權;獎賞權;法制權;結構方程模式;二維權力模式;Coercive power;Expert power;Likability power;Reward power;Referent Power;Structural Equation Modeling;Bivariate Power Model
    Date: 2011
    Issue Date: 2011-12-28 18:15:01 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在現今激烈的產業競爭環境中,企業產品銷售的成敗通常與其通路成員間的關係好壞,有著密不可分的關係,故通路權力是一個重要的問題。在本研究中主要以金酒公司作為個案研究,利用結構方程模式進行探討金酒公司與零售商之間通路權力關係模式,然而結構方程模式的研究結果,只能判斷正負影響,而以Kano模式為基礎的二維權力模式,可進一步說明影響之類型。因此,本研究進一步將結構方程模式之研究結果整合以Kano二維品質模式為基礎的二維權力模式,藉以找出真正影響通路成員間較為關鍵的權力要素。本研究結果顯示,「強制權」、「專家權」、「親和權」與「獎賞權」會影響到金酒公司通路權力;其次,透過二維權力方法得知,「強制權」與「專家權」為反轉權力,「親和權」與「獎賞權」為魅力權力。未來金酒公司可加強運用「魅力權力」,避免過度使用「反轉權力」,以強化通路成員間合作之關係。
    There have an inseparable relationship between the sales success of product selling and channel members in today''s fiercely competitive environment. This research explores the power relationship between the Kinmen Kaoliang Liquor Inc. (KKL) and whoes retailers by the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). However the result of SEM only decides the relationship is positive or negative, two-dimensional power model based on Kano’s model could explain the effect type further. Therefore, this research integrates the result of SEM and the two-dimensional power model based on Kano’s model to find the real key power factor to affect the channel members. In this research to show that affecting the channel power of KKL is among the Coercive power, Expert power, Likability power and Reward power. In addition to, the Coercive power and the Expert power are Reverse power; the Legitimate power and Reward power are Attractive power by bivariate power approach (BPA). The KKL should enhance the Attractive power that avoids applying the Reverse power to strengthen the collaborative relationship with channel members.
    Appears in Collections:[管理科學學系暨研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML101View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback