English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 49378/84106 (59%)
Visitors : 7372166      Online Users : 65
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/73901


    Title: 澎湖縣國民中學教師使用電子白板融入教學之現況調查研究
    Other Titles: A research of junior high school teachers on using interactive whiteboard in PengHu County
    Authors: 溫慈羚;Wen, Tzu-Ling
    Contributors: 淡江大學教育科技學系碩士在職專班
    徐新逸;Shyu, Hsin-yih
    Keywords: 電子白板;資訊教育;澎湖縣;Interactive Whiteboard;Information education;Penghu County
    Date: 2011
    Issue Date: 2011-12-28 17:28:38 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究旨在探討澎湖縣國民中學教師使用電子白板融入教學之現況與遭遇到的問題,並將研究結果提供相關單位作為參考。本文以編制問卷與訪談大綱之方式,對澎湖縣14所國民中學各校推動者共14人與28位教學教師進行調查。所蒐集的問卷資料進行百分比統計、平均數等統計分析,提出下列研究結論:
    一、教師在應用電子白板的領域:最多用於綜合與藝文領域,但使用頻率甚低,主要使用的考量因素是以呈現影音圖片等多元素材以及吸引學生學習興趣為主。此外,造成影響繼續使用的因素,主要是課程設計較費時,及缺乏教學素材資源。
    二、年資低之教師、擔任導師之教師、班級數3班的學校規模之教師、在澎湖離島地區任教之教師大多都沒有應用電子白板融入教學。
    三、教師使用電子白板融入教學的意願是正向的。
    四、整體而言,教師對於電子白板的裝設位置、操作功能以及在教學上的助益皆感到滿意,
    給予正面的評價。
    五、學校在推動電子白板融入教學上缺乏考量教師使用的便利性、缺乏有效組織學校電子白板團隊、及缺乏整合教學資源與缺乏檢討反省機制。
    六、學校推動電子白板融入教學上遭遇到的問題:主要為學校空間規劃、地區氣候影響、
    教師人力資源、制度傳承問題、以及相關經費來源。
    根據上述研究結論,提出建議,以供教育行政機關、學校、國中教師以及未來研究之參考依據。
    The main purpose of this study is to explore the current condition and problems of applying the interactive whiteboard(IWB) in junior high school in Penghu County. In the study, questionnaires and interview outlines, which were developed based on literature, were surveyed on fourteen promoters and twenty-eight teachers in junior high school. The collected data were analyzed and presented in percentages and averages. The results are shown as follows.
    1. IWB is especially applied to the domains of Arts and Humanities. However, the frequency of using the IWB is low. The main factors of using IWB are to display the content and attract the interests of the students. The factors of not continuously using the IWB are time-consuming and the lack of related teaching material resources.
    2. Most teachers who do not use the IWB in teaching are those who have few experience in teaching, the homeroom teachers, and those who teach in the schools with three classes and on off-shore islands in Penghu County.
    3. Overall, teachers are willingful in using IWB for their teaching.
    4. The teachers have positive attitude and high satisfaction towards interactive whiteboards.
    5. Schools always do not take the convenience of using IWB into consideration, and lack the complete organization of the school IWB team, and also lack the conformity of the teaching resources and the self-examination.
    6. The limitations of promoting IWB in teaching at school are (1) the spatial arrangement, (2) the influence of regional climate, (3) the human resources of teachers, (4) the inheritance of the system and (5) budgets for maintainance.
    Based on the above results, suggestions are provided to educational administrative organizations, schools, junior high school teachers, and future study for the reference.
    Appears in Collections:[教育科技學系暨研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML139View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback