本研究主要目的有四項：一、瞭解我國私立大學院校產學合作的現況；二、理解我國私立大學院校產學合作的困境；三、探求我國私立大學院校針對產學合作的困境所採取的因應策略；四、根據研究結果提出具體意見，以提供各私立大學院校作為參考。 本研究以文件分析法及半結構式訪談法為研究方法，以四間私立大學院校為訪談對象，研究工具為自製的「我國私立大學院校產學合作之狀況訪談大綱」。 本研究歸納出以下結論： 壹、我國私立大學院校產學合作的現況 一、受訪學校位置不影響產學合作； 二、各校產學合作分類方式不同； 三、人文學科領域在產學合作中的比例是偏低的； 四、各校產學發展策略皆不相同； 五、受訪學校的產學經費多來自外界； 六、拓展產學合作的規模可解決財務的困難； 七、受訪學校皆有聘請外界專業人員到校指導。 貳、我國私立大學院校產學合作的困境 一、受訪學校面對設備問題時有各自的因應方式； 二、受訪學校在跨領域整合上仍有待加強； 三、繁雜的行政程序會影響教師參與產學合作的意願； 四、教師升等仍無法以產學績效替代學術著作； 五、教師需注意研究成果是否有侵權或被侵權的情形； 六、政府對產學合作中的交易行為課稅是否會影響產學效果仍有待觀察。 参、我國私立大學院校產學合作的因應策略 一、租借場地或運用現有空間是多數受訪學校解決空間不足的辦法； 二、與校友合作、慎選合作對象與訂定契約可降低合作失敗的風險； 三、人力資源是各校資源整合平台發展的重點； 四、提高產學合作的理念層級可降低平息學校內部的糾紛； 五、教師應透過學校單位進行產學合作。 The purposes of this study are: 1) to understand the current situation of university-industry (U-I) cooperation for private universities in Taiwan; 2) to document the difficulties faced by private universities in U-I cooperation; 3) to explore the strategies adopted by private universities in U-I cooperation; and 4) to provide suggestions to private universities. Research methodology for this study includes document analysis and semi-structured interview. Four private universities are selected to be studied. The conclusions of the study are as follows: I. Regarding the current situation of U-I cooperation of private universities: 1) The location of the universities does not influence U-I cooperation; 2) Classification of U-I cooperation differs among the universities; 3) The proportion of humanities field is low in U-I cooperation; 4) Universities adopt different developmental strategies; 5) Expenditures for U-I cooperation are mostly from outside sources; 6) Expanding the scale of U-I cooperation may solve financial difficulties; 7) Universities have employed professionals as consultants. II. Regarding the difficulties of U-I cooperation faced by private universities: 1)Universities have developed strategies to cope with equipment problems; 2) Transdisciplinary integration needs to be improved; 3) Complicated administrative procedures reduces faculty members’ desire to participate in U-I cooperation; 4) Faculty members’ performance in U-I cooperation is not considered in faculty promotion; 5) Faculty should watch out for infringement of research findings; 6) It is unclear what effects it might bring shall the government levy tax on U-I cooperation. III. Regarding the coping strategies adopted by private universities: 1)Universities have rented space to solve the problem of space deficiency; 2) Universities have carefully selected their cooperation partners, worked with alumni, and signed contracts to reduce the risk of failure; 3) Universities have built platforms to integrate university resources; and 4) Raising the level in charge of U-I cooperation may reduce internal dispute; 5) Faculty members should take on U-I cooperation projects through their universities.
