English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 51511/86795 (59%)
造訪人次 : 8280149      線上人數 : 114
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/73834


    題名: 大臺北地區機構社會工作人員幸福感之探討
    其他題名: The exploration of the sense of happiness among social workers in Taipei metropolitan area
    作者: 溫文傑;Wun, Wen-Jie
    貢獻者: 淡江大學教育心理與諮商研究所碩士班
    林淑萍;Lin, Shu-Ping
    關鍵詞: 社工人員;社會支持;人格特質;幸福感;Social workers;social support;Personality;happiness
    日期: 2011
    上傳時間: 2011-12-28 17:16:59 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究旨在探討大台北地區機構社工人員幸福感之現況及與社會支持、人格特質三者的相關。為達研究目的,本研究採取問卷調查法及立意取樣的方式,以大台北地區機構社工人員作業研究樣本,共發出有效樣本共計409份。問卷填寫以描述性統計、單因子變異數分析、Pearson積差相關、逐步多元迴歸等方法來進行統計分析。
    研究結果如下:
    一、大台北地區機構社工人員幸福感呈現中間偏下。
    二、大北地區機構社工人員社會支持來源,以「家人社會支持」最高,而以「督導社會支持」最低。
    三、大台北地區機構社工人員社會支持類型,以「情緒支持」最高,而以「工具支持」最低。
    四、大台北地區機構社工人員社會支持來源與類型中,以「家人情緒支持」最高,而以「督導工具支持」最低。
    五、大台北地區機構社工人員之人格特質傾向於和善性。
    六、大台北地區機構社工人員的幸福感會因年齡、學歷、婚姻狀態、工作年資、宗教信仰有顯著差異。
    七、大台北地區機構社工人員的整體社會支持與幸福感具顯著相關。
    八、大台北地區機構社工人員之人格特質中外向性、開放性、和善性及嚴謹性與幸福感有顯著的正相關。
    九、大台北地區機構社工人員之社會支持與人格特質能有效解釋幸福感,其中以人格特質中「外向性」人格對於幸福感表現預測最大。
    最後,研究結論,提供相關建議作為社會工作人員與社會福利機構未來研究之參考。
    The mental health issue has been wildly investigated in psychology(e.g., Diener, 1984; Smith, 2008). However, the research on the general psychological well-being among social workers has remained scarce, especially in Taiwan. Therefore, the study aimed to explore the relations among the sense of happiness, perceived social support, and personality traits among social workers in Taiwan. There were 409 social workers from various work sites in Taipei metropolitan area participated in this study. The results of this study indicated:
    1.The sense of happiness among social workers in Taipei metropolitan area was below average (M=2.22; SD=.417). The sense of happiness varies due to their age, education degree, marriage status, work seniority, and religious belief.
    2.Among the sources of social support (family, colleagues, and supervisors ), support from family ranked the highest(M=3.49; SD=.709); while the support from the supervisors scored the lowest(M=2.96; SD=.676).In terms of types of social support (emotion, evaluation, and information), emotion support ranked the highest (M=3.54; SD=.531),evaluation support the second(M=2.62;SD=.365),and instrumental support the lowest(M=2.14; SD=3.68).Together,the emotion support from family (M=3.69; SD=.830)
    provided the best support for social workers in general; while the instrumental support from supervisor scored the lowest (M=2.35; SD=.712).

    3.Social workers, in general, exhibited rather agreeableness(M=4.69; SD=.628), conscientious(M=.451; SD=.636), extraverted(M=4.25; SD=.725), open(M=4.28; SD=.662), personality traits than neurotic characteristics(M=3.44; SD=695).

    4.There are positive correlation between the sense of happiness and social support (r=.302; p<.01), regardless types and sources of social support, among social workers.

    5.In terms of personality traits, the sense of happiness are positively correlated to extraversion (r=.499; p<.01), openness((r=.483; p<.01),conscientiousness (r=.383; p<.01), and agreeableness (r=.419; p<.01); and negatively correlated to neuroticism (r=-.340; p<.01).
    顯示於類別:[教育心理與諮商研究所] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML326檢視/開啟

    在機構典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

    TAIR相關文章

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - 回饋