English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 49287/83828 (59%)
Visitors : 7151165      Online Users : 69
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/73775


    Title: 俄羅斯政治文化對俄國民主化進程之影響 : 以普京時期為例(2000-2008)
    Other Titles: The impacts of Russian political culture on the process of democratization in Russia in the Putin's era (2000-2008)
    Authors: 周倩如;Chou, Chien-Ju
    Contributors: 淡江大學俄羅斯研究所碩士班
    彼薩列夫;Pisarev, Aleksandr
    Keywords: 政治文化;民主化;主權民主;普京;Political culture;democratization;Sovereign Democracy;Putin
    Date: 2011
    Issue Date: 2011-12-28 17:03:31 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 俄羅斯從戈巴契夫與葉爾欽以來都致力於邁向民主化,但一個國家從中央集權要邁向民主並不是一件輕而易舉的事情。在一個國家從中央集權轉化為民主的過程中,政治文化為其重要樞紐之一。
    受到傳統政治文化與民主思潮的影響,俄羅斯不斷的在民主與威權之間做選擇。然而,戈巴契夫與葉爾欽時期並沒有妥善解決此矛盾。因此,普京政權藉由「俄羅斯思想」與「主權民主」,對國內政策進行改革與控制。
    為了結束俄國在轉型時期中所造成的混亂,普丁透過「垂直的總統權力」與「法律上的獨裁」來建立強大的國家,在對聯邦制度、政黨以及媒體的改革上也是如此。此外,俄羅斯的「超級總統制」也將領導人的個人因素突出,而這樣的體制對俄羅斯的民主化亦產生了舉足輕重的影響。
    雖然實施民主,但卻可從中看出政治文化中的「集權主義」、「強人政治」等特徵。本論文探討的重點在於俄羅斯獨有的政治文化是如何影響三位領導人的政治選擇與發展。
    In Russia, Gorbachev and Yeltsin have been committed to democratization in the past, but it’s not an easy task for a centralized country to move towards democracy. The political culture plays a crucial role in the process of transit of a centralized country towards democracy.
    Under the influence of the traditional political culture, Russia makes a choice between democracy and authoritarianism in favor of the latter. However, both Gorbachev and Yeltsin didn’t resolve this contradiction properly. As a result, the Putin administration has reformed domestic policies according to “Russian idea” and “sovereign democracy.”
    In order to end the transitional turmoil left by Yeltsin era, the Putin administration has tried to establish a strong state and carry out his federal system, party reform as well as media reform with “vertical presidential power” and “dictatorship of law.” In addition, the super-presidential system in Russia has also emphasized the leader’s personal factors, and this kind of system indeed affects the democratization in Russia.
    Although the democracy has been implemented in Russia, “totalitarianism” and “strongman politics” of political culture still appear to be apart of the Russian political process. This thesis puts emphasis on how political culture in Russia has affected these three Russian leaders’ political preferences and political developments.
    Appears in Collections:[俄羅斯研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML291View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback