English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 62830/95882 (66%)
Visitors : 4078143      Online Users : 792
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/72288


    Title: Are credit spreads too low or too high? A hybrid barrier option approach for financial distress
    Authors: Lin, William;Sun, David
    Contributors: 淡江大學財務金融學系
    Date: 2009-12
    Issue Date: 2011-10-24 10:20:04 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    Abstract: Based on the works of Brockman, P. and Turtle, H. J. (2003) and Giesecke, K. (2004), we propose in this study a hybrid barrier option model to explain observed credit spreads. It is free of problems with the structural model, which underprescribed credit spreads for investment grade corporate bonds and overprescribed the high-yield issues. Unlike the standard barrier option approach, our hybrid model does not imply, for high-yield issues with firms under financial stress, a reduction of credit spreads while firm value actually falls. Our empirical analysis supports that when credit spreads are quoted abnormally higher or rising faster than expected, unexpected changes tend to persist. Otherwise a significant and prompt reversion to long-term equilibrium takes place. This asymmetric pricing phenomenon is validated with a method introduced by Enders, W. and Granger, C. W. J. (1998) and Enders, W. and Siklos, P. L. (2001). The pricing asymmetry could not have been produced by a structural model employing only standard option. But it is consistent with a hybrid barrier option model. Our model characterizes the valuation of debt under financial stress and the asymmetric price pattern better than both the classical structural and the standard barrier option approaches. It can be extended to the study of individual CDS for its better liquidity than individual corporate bonds. This study provides helpful implications especially for the medium and high-yield issues in pricing as well as portfolio diversification. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 29:1161–1189, 2009
    Relation: Journal of Futures Markets 29(12), pp.1161-1189
    DOI: 10.1002/fut.20418
    Appears in Collections:[財務金融學系暨研究所] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    Are credit spreads too low or too high A hybrid barrier option approach for financial distress.pdf303KbAdobe PDF0View/Open
    index.html0KbHTML214View/Open
    index.html0KbHTML59View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback