Discussion of "Comparison of Linear Scheduling Model and Repetitive Scheduling Method"by Kris G. Mattila and Amy Park

淡江大學機構典藏 > 工學院 > 土木工程學系暨研究所 > 期刊論文 > Item 987654321/69738

jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/69738

题名:	Discussion of "Comparison of Linear Scheduling Model and Repetitive Scheduling Method"by Kris G. Mattila and Amy Park
作者:	楊亦東;Ioannou, Photios G.
贡献者:	淡江大學土木工程學系
日期:	2004-05
上传时间:	2011-10-23 19:52:52 (UTC+8)
摘要:	This paper mistakenly treats the ‘‘controlling sequence’’ defined for the first time in Harris and Ioannou ~1998! as a synonym for the critical path in the traditional critical path method ~CPM!, by stating that ‘‘the control points in the repetitive scheduling method ~RSM! are used to define the controlling sequence of activities, the critical path in a CPM schedule, which in turn determines the project duration.’’ Yet, the introduction of the ‘‘controlling sequence’’ and its differentiation from the traditional critical path is a main contribution of RSM, which should be pointed out and recognized explicitly. By overlooking this important distinction, the paper ends with misleading results. Moreover, the paper identifies critical activities incorrectly, such as in Figs. 5, 7, 13, 15, 20, and 22. Thus, the purpose of this discussion is to correct these misunderstandings and to clarify the original definitions of the controlling sequence and critical activities in RSM.
關聯:	ASCE Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 130(3), pp.461-463
显示于类别:	[土木工程學系暨研究所] 期刊論文

文件中的档案:

档案	描述	大小	格式	浏览次数
Discussion of Comparison of Linear Scheduling Model and Repetitive Scheduling Method by Kris G. Mattila and Amy Park.pdf		153Kb	Adobe PDF	1	检视/开启
index.html		0Kb	HTML	19	检视/开启

在機構典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

TAIR相关文章