English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 56570/90363 (63%)
造访人次 : 11878173      在线人数 : 77
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻

    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/69738

    题名: Discussion of "Comparison of Linear Scheduling Model and Repetitive Scheduling Method"by Kris G. Mattila and Amy Park
    作者: 楊亦東;Ioannou, Photios G.
    贡献者: 淡江大學土木工程學系
    日期: 2004-05
    上传时间: 2011-10-23 19:52:52 (UTC+8)
    摘要: This paper mistakenly treats the ‘‘controlling sequence’’ defined
    for the first time in Harris and Ioannou ~1998! as a synonym for
    the critical path in the traditional critical path method ~CPM!, by
    stating that ‘‘the control points in the repetitive scheduling
    method ~RSM! are used to define the controlling sequence of
    activities, the critical path in a CPM schedule, which in turn determines
    the project duration.’’ Yet, the introduction of the ‘‘controlling
    sequence’’ and its differentiation from the traditional critical
    path is a main contribution of RSM, which should be pointed
    out and recognized explicitly. By overlooking this important distinction,
    the paper ends with misleading results. Moreover, the
    paper identifies critical activities incorrectly, such as in Figs. 5, 7,
    13, 15, 20, and 22. Thus, the purpose of this discussion is to
    correct these misunderstandings and to clarify the original definitions
    of the controlling sequence and critical activities in RSM.
    關聯: ASCE Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 130(3), pp.461-463
    显示于类别:[土木工程學系暨研究所] 期刊論文





    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - 回馈