English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 49258/83791 (59%)
Visitors : 7141794      Online Users : 47
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/66103


    Title: Identifying elderly depression using the Depression Rating Scale as part of comprehensive standardised care assessment in nursing homes
    Authors: Huang, Ya-Chien;Carpenter, Iain
    Contributors: 淡江大學多元文化與語言學系
    Keywords: nursing home;Depression Rating Scale;routine assessment;interRAI LTCF
    Date: 2011-08
    Issue Date: 2013-05-31 10:47:53 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: Abingdon: Routledge
    Abstract: Objectives: This study used data from the SHELTER (Services and Health for Elderly in Long TERm care) project to explore the benefits of using the Depression Rating Scale (DRS) as part of a standardised needs assessment in UK nursing homes, including a statistical method of effectively identifying characteristics linking to residents’ depression.
    Method: About 499 residents in nine nursing homes in south-east England were assessed with interRAI Long Term Care Facilities (interRAI LTCF), a standardised assessment tool containing the validated DRS residents who scored 3 or more on the DRS were considered ‘might suffer from depression’. A list of characteristics associated with depression was then examined using bivariate analysis and logistic regression.
    Results: Among the 499 residents assessed, 67.5% were not depressed (DRS < 3) and 32.3% might suffer from depression (DRS ≥ 3). The final logistic model showed ‘never married’ (p = 0.019), ‘diagnosis of COPD’ (COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) (p = 0.015), ‘feelings of pain’ (p = 0.015) and ‘trouble sleeping’ (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with reporting of DRS score of 3 and more.
    Conclusion: The article argued that DRS has distinctive advantages for using in UK nursing homes where a preponderance of residents is cognitively impaired, the procedure of screening depression is not regulated and resources to treat depression is relatively scarce. This article also demonstrated how using the DRS as part of a comprehensive standardised needs assessment facilitates analysis of characteristics linking to depression, which has significant policy implications in improving care quality and management.
    Relation: Aging & Mental Health 15(8), pp.1045-1051
    DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2011.583626
    Appears in Collections:[多元文化與語言學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    1360-7863_15(8)p1045-1051.pdf118KbAdobe PDF279View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback