English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 50122/85141 (59%)
Visitors : 7890838      Online Users : 67
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/65607


    Title: 從基點定價(Basing-Point Pricing)論平行行為與聯合行為--以美國反托辣斯法為中心
    Other Titles: On Collusive and Parallel Behavior from the Basing-Point Pricing--An Experience from American Antitrust Laws
    Authors: 陳志民
    Contributors: 淡江大學公共行政學系
    Keywords: 基點定價;平行行為;聯合行為;美國;反托辣斯法
    Date: 1997-01
    Issue Date: 2013-07-11 11:43:09 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 臺北市:行政院公平交易委員會
    Abstract: 自「基點定價」(Basing-PointPricing)方式於美國產業界出現以來,由於其特殊之價格決定模式與廠商間之聯合行為極為類似,多數學者與司法權構皆認為其乃當然違反反托辣斯法(AntitrustLaws)之反競爭行為。爾等所持之理由乃透過基點定價,位於寡占市場中之廠商得藉由「運費吸收」(FreightAbsorption)與獲取「幽靈運費」(PhantomFreight)等方式以監控彼此之行為,進而鞏固業者聞之聯合協議。美國西北大學(NorthwesternUniversity)法學院教授DavidD.Haddock於1982年發表於「美國經濟評論」(AmericanEconomicReview)之一篇重要論文中對此見解提出質疑。其從經濟分析之角度廣泛且深入探討基點定價之促進競爭效果,並認為基點定價多數乃市場競爭下之產物。因此,執法機構欲以反托辣斯法禁止之,結果恐將適得其反!本文擬從法律與經濟分析之觀點探討此一議題。並藉此檢討我國公平交易法對平行行為與聯合行為認定之相關問題。
    Relation: 公平交易季刊=Fair Trade Quarterly 5(1),頁65-96
    Appears in Collections:[公共行政學系暨研究所] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML102View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback