English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 55224/89525 (62%)
Visitors : 10725379      Online Users : 32
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/64257

    Title: 公司自我選擇聘任會計師與審計公費
    Other Titles: Self-Selection of Auditors and Audit Fees
    Authors: 張瑀珊;薛敏正;高君慈
    Contributors: 淡江大學會計學系
    Keywords: 自我選擇聘任會計師;審計公費;四大事務所公費溢酬;議價能力;self-selection of auditors;audit fees;big 4 premium;bargaining power
    Date: 2008/11/01
    Issue Date: 2011-10-20 12:54:55 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 淡江會計教育基金會
    Abstract: 國內過去有關審計公費之研究,受限於資料的取得,多以問卷調查方式進行探討,且對審計市場是否存在公費溢酬情形,未獲一致結論。本研究以 2002 年至 2005 年符合證期局規範條件而須揭露審計公費之上市、上櫃與興櫃公司為樣本,並參考 Chaney et al. (2004) 之研究,採用 Heckman (1979) 之兩階段程序,探討公司聘任會計師之自我選擇考量對審計公費定價之影響。實證結果顯示,控制公司自我選擇會計師事務所的影響後,台灣審計市場不存在大型事務所公費溢酬之現象,與 Chaney et al. (2004)的發現ㄧ致。另一方面,本研究亦考量客戶議價能力對審計公費之影響,將樣本區分為大、小規模客戶群分析,研究結果顯示國內僅在小規模客戶群中存有公費溢酬之現象。此結果符合 Casterella et al. (2004) 之研究所述,小規模公司的議價能力相對較低,因此大型會計師事務所可在小規模客戶群中收取較高的審計公費。
    Audit fees have been partially publicly disclosed in Taiwan since 2002. Before 2002, most of the research was based on survey information to examine audit fees’ research in Taiwan. In addition, there is still no consistent empirical evidence indicating whether there is a name-brand premium in Taiwan’s audit market. Following Chaney et al. (2004), this study uses the two-stage procedure proposed by Heckman (1979) to examine whether self-selection of auditors will affect audit pricing and to investigate whether clients firms choosing name-brand auditors will need to pay higher fees. Our research samples focus on those firms trading stocks in Taiwan stock markets (TSE and OTC market) and disclosing audit fees based on the requirement of Securities and Futures Bureau from 2002 to 2005. Consistent with the findings of Chaney et al. (2004), we do not find a Big 4 premium as we control for self-selection bias of auditors. Furthermore, this study considers the role of clients’bargaining power in the audit pricing process and finds that only smaller client firms choosing name-brand auditors have to face higher audit fees.
    Relation: 當代會計=Journal of Contemporary Accounting 9(2),頁167-200
    DOI: 10.6675%2fJCA.2008.9.2.02
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute & Department of Accounting] Journal Article

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback