淡江大學機構典藏:Item 987654321/61086
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 62822/95882 (66%)
Visitors : 4021379      Online Users : 1028
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/61086


    Title: PECKING ORDER THEORY REVISITED: THE ROLE OF AGENCY COST
    Authors: Wang, Kuang-cheng A.;Lin, Chun-hung A.
    Contributors: 淡江大學產業經濟學系
    Date: 2010-09
    Issue Date: 2011-10-15 11:28:35 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
    Abstract: Considering conflicts between shareholders and managers, we revisit the external pecking order of corporate financing under conditions of information asymmetry. With the possibility that debt financing may lead a firm to bankruptcy, we find first that the external pecking order could be reversed. Second, pooling equilibria also exist in our model in two forms: debt issuance and equity issuance. Our results modify pecking-order theory and explain some empirical findings of Jung et al. (Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 42 (1996), pp. 159–185).
    Relation: The Manchester School 78(5), pp.395-411
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9957.2010.02201.x
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute & Department of Industrial Economics] Journal Article

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    1467-9957_78(5)p395-411.pdf135KbAdobe PDF320View/Open
    PECKING ORDER THEORY REVISITED THE ROLE OF AGENCY COST.pdf135KbAdobe PDF0View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback