淡江大學機構典藏:Item 987654321/57283
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 62861/95882 (66%)
Visitors : 4191408      Online Users : 828
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/57283


    Title: 引文格式規範對引文分析之影響 : 學術出版之傳播效應
    Other Titles: The Impact of the Citation Formats on Citation Analysis: From Scholarly Publishing to Scholarly Communication Effect
    Authors: 邱炯友;張瑜倫
    Contributors: 淡江大學資訊與圖書館學系
    Date: 2005-04
    Issue Date: 2011-09-13 15:46:46 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所
    Abstract: 學術傳播常常循著「引用文獻」(citation)和「同儕評閱」(peer review)之兩階段軸線發展,兼具量與質。其中引用文獻分析所賴以建立的引文(註釋)格式問題,基本上是一種植基於質化運用上的量化研究,也日此引文格式之探討應為解決引文索引爭議的核心。唯有詳細嚴謹的學術引文規範以及妥善運用的引文文獻分析技術,方足以架構良性的學術傳播環境。本研究除了探討引文分析較為人知曉的幾項爭議外,更探析引文格式,尤以APA、Chicageo(Turabian)、MLA三者對於引文分析之效益及其影響。當涉及學術規範「統一」、引文格式本身特性、二次引用、引文計數之公平合理等問題時,引文分析所及之應用研與引文格式間之關係,自然無法被漠視,毫無疑問的是引文格式是學術傳播與出版之基石。
    Scholarly communication nearly always traces its development by examining the uses of citation and peer review in which have become the two mainstreams of publication. It is a compound of qualitative and quantitative features that to mainstreams have kept intact. Nevertheless, the citation analysis based on a particular documentation style has become a quantitative research of quality. A study of citation format or documentation style should be treated as the core issue of citation indexing lies. It is believed that a well-established and disciplinary citation analysis technique with documentation style will be of a fundamental rules for developing the decent scholarly communication environment. This article explores the efficiencies and influences of three notable styles, the APA, the Chicago (Turabian) and the MLA. On their problems of citation analysis. While there are problems on documentation styles unification, features, indirect source citing and even for the fairness of citation count, there is the solution that documentation style is the fundamentals of scholarly communication and of scholarly publishing.
    Relation: 圖書館學與資訊科學 31(1),頁54-69
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute & Department of Information and Library Sciences] Journal Article

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML108View/Open
    引文格式規範對引文分析之影響 學術出版之傳播效應.pdf390KbAdobe PDF1View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback