淡江大學機構典藏:Item 987654321/55892
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 62819/95882 (66%)
Visitors : 3999853      Online Users : 678
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/55892


    Title: Comparison of SOM-based Optimization and Particle Swarm Optimization for Minimizing the Construction Time of a Secant Pile Wall
    Authors: Chen, Jieh-Haur;Yang, Li-Ren;Su, Mu-Chun
    Contributors: 淡江大學企業管理學系
    Keywords: Self organizing map;Particle swarm;Optimization;Construction time;Secant pile wall
    Date: 2009-10
    Issue Date: 2011-09-02 09:57:04 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: Amsterdam: Elsevier BV
    Abstract: Optimization of construction time helps practitioners save time and money. In this study we compare two optimization methods — self organizing map based optimization (SOMO) and particle swarm optimization (PSO) — for minimizing the construction time of a secant pile wall. The comparison is based on data from 207 primary and secondary bored piles for a secant pile wall. The detailed construction time is measured in minutes and broken down into 16 work activities for each unit of the wall which is then used to yield the optimal construction sequence and time. Both optimization methods can be computed quickly but, SOMO yields a more efficient construction sequence with a shorter construction time. The comparison leads to several findings. Particles with randomly selected velocities and positions may lead to convergence at a local optimization. The PSO comparison mechanism for the yielding of optimization limits the process to the winner's neighbors, which may also converge to a local optimization. The case study shows the superiority of SOMO and provides answers to the dilemmas using the smallest hyper-plane, the entire comparison mechanism to yield the optimization, and the mechanism for weight adjustment between the winner neuron and its neighbors.
    Relation: Automation in Construction 18(6), pp.844-848
    DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2009.03.008
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute & Department of Business Administration] Journal Article

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML117View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback