English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 62819/95882 (66%)
Visitors : 4002319      Online Users : 712
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/55583


    Title: 台灣半導體產業政策之研究:政策工具研究途徑
    Authors: 黃婉玲
    Contributors: 公共行政學系暨研究所
    指導教授: 陳恆鈞博士
    Keywords: 政策工具;半導體產業;產業政策;政策規劃;政策執行
    Date: 2004-01
    Issue Date: 2011-08-23 17:09:41 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文係以台灣半導體產業政策為研究個案,從政策工具的研究角度切入,探討過去產業政策手段的利弊得失,以及未來產業政策工具的最適走向。首先,本文回顧過去相關之政策工具理論,歸納出選擇政策工具時最重要的四項衡量要素:環境系絡、問題本質、國家機關職能、社會團體能力。在規劃評估分析階段,以環境系絡與問題本質之交互配合為分析的核心;在可行性分析階段,則以國家機關職能與社會團體能力為探討的重點。據此配合治理概念下的政策工具分類,建構「最適政策工具選擇標準」;而各類政策工具的使用應以「互補策略」為前提,採「包裹應用」的方式為之。

    其次,筆者參閱與本個案相關之政府出版品、計畫報告,逐一整理台灣自一九六0年代至今半導體產業的發展歷程,以及政府所推行之重大產業政策,並從中推導出各項政策所使用之政策工具。最後,再以「最適政策工具選擇標準」,檢視過去半導體產業政策工具是否運用得當,並為未來政策工具的選擇提供政策建議。而研究發現,「引導型」工具之下的公共資訊、能力建構、組織聯盟等工具;與「基礎型」工具之下的公共服務、法規制定、金融體系等工具;以及「間接型」工具之下的契約簽訂、政府投資企業兩項工具;和某些「直接型」工具,例如稅式支出、財政補助等工具,會是最為合適的選擇。

    This essay studies Taiwan’s Semi-Conductor industrial policy with policy instrument approach. It discusses the advantages and disadvantages of industrial policy means in the past and the most appropriate trend of industrial policy instruments in the future. First, it reviews previous policy instrument theories and sums up four most important thinking items when we choose policy instruments: environment context, problem characters, state capacity, society ability. In planning evaluation analysis stage, it focuses on cooperation of environment context and problem characters. In feasible analysis stage, state capacity and society ability were emphasized. According to this and policy instrument types from governance concept, it constructs “the most appropriate policy instruments selection standard”. Besides, we should apply different kinds of policy instruments by “give-and-take strategy” and “package way”.

    Following that, this paper makes reference relative government’s publications and plan reports and gradually concludes the developed process of Taiwan’s Semi-Conductor industry from 1960 to today, important industrial policies made by government, and policy instruments they used. Finally, it examines if policy instruments they used are appropriate and provides policy advice for selection of policy instruments in the future by “the most appropriate policy instruments selection standard”. The conclusion of this research are that public information, ability structuring, organization associating of guidance instruments; public service, laws making, and finance systems of foundation instruments; contracting and government-sponsored enterprise of indirct instruments; and some direct instruments such as tax expenditure and finance grant are the most appropriate selection.
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute & Department of Public Administration] Thesis

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback