淡江大學機構典藏:Item 987654321/55470
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 62830/95882 (66%)
造访人次 : 4032016      在线人数 : 940
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/55470


    题名: 施政表現在不同層級地方選舉中的影響:2009年雲林縣縣長及鄉鎮市長選舉之分析
    其它题名: Government Performance and Voter Choice in Local Elections: The Case of 2009 Yunlin County and Township Magistrates Elections
    作者: 蕭怡靖;黃紀
    贡献者: 淡江大學公共行政學系
    关键词: 施政表現;投票抉擇;地方選舉;Government performance;Vote choice;Local elections
    日期: 2011-11
    上传时间: 2013-04-11 14:40:22 (UTC+8)
    出版者: 臺北市:政治大學選舉研究中心
    摘要: 自由公平的選舉是民主政治的核心價值。透過定期改選,民眾依據執政者的施政表現決定投票意向,即是責任政治的展現。而依據學理探 討,政府的施政表現在不同層級的地方選舉中,對選民的投票抉擇應有不同的影響。在層級較高的選舉,中央政府施政表現的影響較大;而在地方基層選舉,地方政府施政表現的影響力則應相對較高。本文以2009年雲林縣縣長及鄉鎮市長選舉為例,利用「台灣選舉與民主化調查」於選後所進行的面訪調查資料進行檢證。結果發現,選民在縣長選舉的投票抉擇上,不論是對中央政府或縣政府的施政表現評價,皆具有顯著的影響效果。但在鄉鎮市長選舉方面,中央政府或縣政府的施政表現評價,則皆不具顯著影響力,甚至政黨認同的解釋力亦大幅下降。作者認為這主要是因為地方選舉型態的特性,以及此次選舉雙方實力差距懸殊的結果導致。此外,本研究也突顯出地方派系在地方基層選舉運作上的影響力不容忽視。
    Free and fair election is the core of democracy. Regular election in turn is the most important vehicle for the electorate to hold the ruling party and government accountable. This paper, based on theoretical arguments, elaborates the effects of government performance at different levels of elections. We argue that the higher the level of elections, the higher the level of government is held accountable by the electorate, while at the bottom local level elections, only the local government performance matters. In the county magistrate’s election, the central government’s performance should play a more important role on voter choice. By contrast, in the township magistrate’s election, the local government’s performance should have greater effects on voter choice. We test this proposition with the case of Yunlin in the 2009 county and township magistrates’ elections with the survey data collected by the Taiwan’s Election and Democratization Study (TEDS) project. We find that indeed voter choice in county magistrate’s election is significantly affected by both central and county government’s performance. However, neither central nor local government performance has significant effect on voter choice in township magistrates’ election. This finding may reflect the fact that bottom-level local elections relies more on social networks and local factions than on government policy evaluation.
    關聯: 選舉研究=Journal of Electoral Studies 18(2),頁59-86
    显示于类别:[公共行政學系暨研究所] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML179检视/开启

    在機構典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

    TAIR相关文章

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - 回馈