淡江大學機構典藏:Item 987654321/54785
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 62805/95882 (66%)
Visitors : 3950830      Online Users : 947
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/54785


    Title: RELIABILITY, VALIDITY, AND INVESTIGATION OF THE INDEX OF LEARNING STYLES IN A CHINESE LANGUAGE VERSION FOR LATE ADOLESCENTS OF TAIWANESE
    Authors: Ku, David Tawei;Shen, Chun-yi
    Contributors: 淡江大學教育科技學系
    Date: 2009
    Issue Date: 2011-07-07 11:01:47 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: San Diego: Libra Publishers, Inc.
    Abstract: The Felder-Soloman Index of Learning Styles (ILS) has been a popular instrument for measuring learning styles of college students for the past two decades. Even though several researchers have translated the ILS into Chinese for their own studies, a Chinese version has not been standardized and evaluated, nor has anyone reported on its reliability and validity. Based on data collected from 2,748 students at a large private university in Taiwan, this study investigates the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the ILS. In addition, through factor analysis and structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis, problematic test items are identified for further modification. Results show that the reliability of each scale of the ILS has a pattern similar to that of previous studies. The study therefore investigates the identified problematic elements and discusses two key points: (1) the language and translation problems and (2) precision and design. In addition, results of the significant interaction effects of analysis of variance (ANOVA) for active/reflective and sensing/intuitive scales indicate the effect of college differences depends on the levels between genders. Moreover, in general, female students are significantly more intuitive and global and less visual than male students. Other detailed analysis of academic disciplines and gender onILS are also reported.
    Relation: Adolescence 44(176), pp.827-850
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute & Department of Educational Technology ] Journal Article

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML98View/Open
    RELIABILITY, VALIDITY, AND INVESTIGATION OF THE INDEX OF LEARNING STYLES IN A CHINESE LANGUAGE VERSION FOR LATE ADOLESCENTS OF TAIWANESE.pdf5069KbAdobe PDF2View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback