English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 62805/95882 (66%)
Visitors : 3923733      Online Users : 570
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/53929


    Title: Improvisation et création collective dans le théâtre du Soleil et Performance Workshop Theatre
    Other Titles: 即興創作與集體創作在陽光劇團與表演工作坊之實踐
    Improvisation and création collective in le théâtre du Soleil and Performance Workshop Theatre
    Authors: 林宗賢;Lin, Chung-Hsien
    Contributors: 淡江大學法國語文學系碩士班
    梁蓉;拉佛海;LIANG, Zong;Lavorel, Guy
    Keywords: 賴聲川;莫努虛金;集體即興創作;暗戀桃花源;1789;Lai Sheng Chuan;Araine Mnouchkine;improvisation;Peach Blossom Land;1789
    Date: 2010
    Issue Date: 2011-06-16 21:40:49 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本論文以探討比較集體即興創作在賴聲川與莫努虛金創作手法上有何異同,並用各自代表作:《暗戀桃花源》和《1789》加以舉例說明。從定義集體即興創作開始,以歷史發展縱向闡述集體即興創作在法國與台灣的主要發展進程。

    第二章探討賴聲川的集體即興創作,以開始、結構與過程、特點與個人美學等四大點,作橫向的分析。並以《我們都是這樣長大的》和《暗戀桃花源》為例解釋其創作過程與技巧展現。

    第三章分析莫努虛金的集體即興創作,以起始、結構與過程、特點與美學觀等四大點,作橫向的分析。並以《1789》為例解釋其創作過程與技巧展現。

    第四章比較《暗戀桃花源》與《1789》,透過對賴聲川以及莫努虛金集體即興創作的了解,去檢視兩個作品中異同點。並透過導演的美學觀、集體即興創作的過程、資料檔案與舞台裝置等四方面,去解析兩位導演的美學觀如何在作品中呈現。

    最後一章歸納賴聲川與莫努虛金的創作思想及其菁華,並指出集體創作和即興創作實為兩個工具,並實行了「抓住瞬間」與「和演員一起創作」等兩大特點來完成其作品。
    Comparison of the thesis of collective improvisation in Lai Sheng Chuan and Araine Mnouchkine How would you compare writing techniques and use their masterpiece: "Peach Blossom Land" and "1789" to be an example. Definition of collective improvisation from start to elaborate the historical development of the longitudinal collective improvisation in France and Taiwan''s main development process.

    Lai Sheng Chuan Chapter of collective improvisation, to start, structure and process, aesthetics, and personal characteristics of the four points for the horizontal analysis. And "we are all so grown up" and "Peach Blossom Land" as an example to explain their creative process and techniques to show.

    Chapter III of Mnouchkine collective improvisation, to initiate, structure and process characteristics and aesthetics of the four major points for the horizontal analysis. And to "1789" as an example to explain their creative process and techniques to show.

    Comparing Chapter IV, "The Peach Blossom Land" and "1789", through to the Lai Sheng Chuan and Mnouchkine understanding of collective improvisation, to examine similarities and differences between the two works. And through the director''s aesthetic, the creative process of collective improvisation, data files and devices, four stage, to resolve how the two directors of the aesthetic concept presented in the works.

    The final chapter sum Lai Sheng Chuan and Mnouchkine and the essence of creative thinking and collective creativity and improvisation that is actually two tools, and implementation of the "seize the moment" and "and the actor with the creation" to accomplish its two major characteristics of such work.
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute & Department of French] Thesis

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML390View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback