淡江大學機構典藏:Item 987654321/52579
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 64178/96951 (66%)
Visitors : 9366691      Online Users : 14063
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/52579


    Title: 迴水影響下圓管流解析法與數值法
    Other Titles: Analytical and numerical solution of circular flow where backwater occurs
    Authors: 許冬福;Hsu, Tung-fu
    Contributors: 淡江大學水資源及環境工程學系碩士班
    王士紘;Wang, Shih-hong
    Keywords: 聖凡納方程式;解析解;下游邊界條件;迴水效應;數值方法;Saint-Venant Eq.;Analytical;Boundary;Backwater;Numerical
    Date: 2010
    Issue Date: 2010-09-23 17:56:05 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 目前解決圓型渠道變量流之洪流演算問題時,大部份是使用套裝軟體或由數值方法來評估,其中所使用之數值方法乃是將渠道變量流中動量方程式得慣性項忽略不計,並將方程式予以線性化,結果與非線性動力波模式非常接近。
    但在計算過程中,因其省略慣性項之故,運用在圓型渠道或下游有迴水影響情況時常與實際情況有所落差,不太滿足工程實用價值,故本論文便以圓型渠道變量流之初步線性解析解與一維性Saint-Venant動力波模式數值解做比較,另外對於下游邊界條件受迴水影響時,兩者之間是否有更大誤差做一比較。
    由結果可得知數值解有部份計算誤差,與解析解誤差較大,又解析解較為接近真解,且其計算應用便利,故解析解具有簡易、經濟、有效率、準確之工程實用價值。
    At present when solves mighty current of calculation problems which unsteady circular flow, the major method is using the coverall software or the numerical methods which be used by the momentum equation in the unsteady open channel flow in the inertia item to be ignored, and make the equation linearization, and the results is almost the same to complete dynamic wave model .
    But therefore in the computational process, because of its abbreviation inertia item, utilizes in the circular channel or the downstream which the backwater occurred. It often makes a little difference with the actual situation, and is not enough to satisfy project of engineering, therefore the present paper use the preliminary linear analytical solution and the one dimension Saint-Venant equation with numerical solution does by the circular flow compares. On the other way, regarding that downstream boundary condition with backwater effect, as soon as whether between both to have bigger errors to do compares.
    By the results may know that the numerical solution has the counting error which bigger than the analytic solution, and then analytical solution is closer to genuine solution, and its computation and application is more convenience, therefore analytical solution may be understood that is simple ,economic, effectiveness, the accurate project use value.
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute & Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering] Thesis

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML282View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback