English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 49647/84944 (58%)
Visitors : 7706879      Online Users : 70
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/52280


    Title: 織理性建築 多層次空間結合架構之研究
    Other Titles: A research on architecture textile:multi-layer structure of space
    Authors: 榮挺鈞;Rhung, Ting-chung
    Contributors: 淡江大學建築學系碩士班
    陳珍誠;Chen, Chen-cheng
    Keywords: 編織;織理性;層次;風格;形式主義;數位建築;分子學;拓樸學;系統;Knitting;Textile;Layer;Style;Formalism;Digital Architecture;Molecular Science;Topology;System
    Date: 2010
    Issue Date: 2010-09-23 17:30:04 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 設計風格對於建築,一直是個有趣且不斷被挑戰的問題。不同的地區、國家、與文化,都試圖找出專屬於自己的建築特色與風格。有人認為風格來自於所謂的文化符號,有人認為建築的風格來自於營建系統,有人認為風格來自於構築。然而在現代主義興盛以前,普遍的對於風格的認知是來自於傳統文化的傳承。拜現代主義之賜,人們逐漸脫離了「從傳統中尋找風格」的想法,而試圖追求過去從未曾見過的各種不同風格。不論是在台灣或是世界各地,都試圖以新的建築風格營造新的特色,以達到所謂的設計創意。
    數位時代的資訊量交流急速暴增,人們的生活方式以及對於美學的價值觀也在快速的改變。拜數位科技以及材料科技進步之賜,人們已經能實現各種過去所無法達成的構築美學。但總的來說,部份建築已從過去純機能的探討而轉變為形式的追求,達到一種類似擬態的境界。除了常見的自然構造物的擬態之外,也有以不同的工藝美學與建築風格的結合創新。其中最常被探討的,除了雕塑之外就是編織了,這兩種藝術都是以平面及立體面為創作對象,就表現形式而言與建築相當類似,也常有直接成為建築裝飾構件的元素之一,例如浮雕及棚架。然而編織中織理性對於建築風格的討論似乎有所侷限,除了構件性質的不同之外,人們對於編織的定義還停留在線條與面體的關係上。因此,織理性對於建築而言,往往還停留在只是一種「表面工夫」,而對於建築空間的構成無法造成明顯的影響。
    編織是一門內容豐富的學問,其內容也涉及許多不同的領域。本研究試圖以各種方式研究編織的可能性。第一,以數學陣列、幾何學、物理學的方式,找出各種編織的構成方式,歸納出一種可以表現各種織物構成的圖示,以便於了解其結構,並可以加以創造出各種編織面。第二,除了由線構成平面的編織之外,本研究亦試圖拓展編織的層面,組合不出同編織面以形成所謂的平面編織。最後討論以空間單元所構成的空間編織形式,試圖組織出空間編織的概念。在設計上則是以循序漸進的方式,逐步討論以線、平面、矩陣為主的空間序列,最後是空間織理性的討論。結論中探討了空間織理與社會行為的關連性,以及空間織理風格在使用上以及建構上可能的問題與限制。
    Style in architecture is a very important issue and has been challenged continuously. Different regions, countries, and culture in the world are trying to find their own architectural characteristics. Some people think that the style of architecture is from the cultural symbols, tectonics, or construction systems. Before modernism flourished, the general perception of the style is from the traditional culture heritage. However, Modernism provides the idea of style gradually from “the re-findings of the past” to pursuing different styles which have never been discovered in the past. All around the world are trying to create a new design features in order to achieve the design creativities.

    Information-exchanging has been growing rapidly in the Digital Era, the way people live and the values of aesthetic have been changed fast too. Together with digital technologies and progresses, people have been able to achieve the architectural forms and spaces that can not be constructed in the past. In general, the focus of architectural design has been shifted from the discussion of functionality to the construction and simulations of distinguishing forms. These distinguishing forms include organic forms from the nature as well as new artifacts crafted from the new technologies. Sculpture and textile are two important issues have been discussed extensively, since these two art-performances shared similar process and visual effects similar to architecture. However, the discussion of archi-textile has been limited on two-dimensional decorations on planar-surface, and archi-textile does not affect the design of three-dimensional spaces too much in consequence.


    Weaving is a great knowledge, has relationships with other disciplines. This study attempted to find out different methods to apply weaving in the design of spaces. Firstly, mathematical array, geometry,, and physics approach have been taken to identify the composition for the various weaving methods, thus the diagrammatic patterns of textile are induced for understanding these structures, and are applied to the design of new patterns. Secondly, apart from the planar-weaving, this research also tries extend weaving into a more sophisticated level, combining with different surfaces to form more complex surfaces. Finally, different units are composed into the three-dimensional space to perform the concept of archi-textile in the space. In the final design stage, the discussions are following the steps of weaving with line, weaving on the plan, matrix-based weaving, and weaving in the three dimensions. Conclusions are made according to the relationships between the archi-textiles in the space and the related social behaviors, as well as the problems and limitations for applying archi-textiles in the design of space and its construction.
    Appears in Collections:[建築學系暨研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML178View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback