歐洲聯盟規範性權力的論述與運用 : 以波士尼亞黑塞哥維納為例

淡江大學機構典藏 > 國際事務學院 > 歐洲研究所 > 學位論文 > Item 987654321/51423

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/51423

Title:	歐洲聯盟規範性權力的論述與運用 : 以波士尼亞黑塞哥維納為例
Other Titles:	The discourse and practice of the EU normative power : a case study of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Authors:	龍瑞雲;Lung, Jui-yun (genoveva),
Contributors:	淡江大學歐洲研究所碩士班甘逸驊;Kan, Francis Yi-hua
Keywords:	歐洲聯盟;波士尼亞黑塞哥維納;規範性權力;頓和平協議;European Union;Bosnia and Herzegovina;Normative Power Europe;Dayton Peace Agreement;Europä;ische Union;Bosnien und Herzegovina;Normative Macht Europa;Abkommen von Dayton
Date:	2010
Issue Date:	2010-09-23 15:15:20 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	本文主旨在探究歐盟如何透過對外政策施展歐洲／歐盟規範性權力。自歐體發展至今，透過一系列的宣言、條約、政策與入盟條件的發展，強調與第三國的合作／夥伴關係為建立在規範性權力的基礎之上。規範性權力可分為五項核心規範(和平、自由、民主、法治和人權)和四項次要規範(社會團結、反歧視、永續發展和良善治理)。此外哥本哈根入盟標準亦屬規範性權力，並在歐盟與候選國間扮演規範性的角色，欲加入歐盟的(潛在)候選國需遵守規範性權力及符合政治、經濟與法律標準方有機會成為會員國。　　本文以波士尼亞-黑塞哥維納共和國(簡稱波黑)為案例國，透過其民主化的發展檢視歐盟規範性權力的效益，鑑於國內社會及國際介入的特殊性，在理論實踐上具有研究價值特以波黑為例。波黑在1995年因國際社會的介入而結束長達3年之久的內戰，並簽署岱頓和平協議。國內治理模式的特殊性與複雜性：在協議中將一國分為兩個政治實體(波克聯邦與塞族共和國)與三個主要種族(波裔、克裔與塞裔)分三區治理，產生三部主要憲法及三位輪值總統；國際介入的多元化：戰後聯合國、北約及歐盟等機構向波黑提供各項援助並協助國家重建，目的是希望透過國際社會，使波黑發展成為符合西方標準的民主國並達到歐盟的標準以邁向歐盟會員國的康莊大道。　　波黑入盟的進程可分為短、中與長期目標。短期目標為任務移轉，透過歐盟特別代表、歐盟警察任務隊與多國穩定部隊接續聯合國與北約的任務執行民事與軍事任務，首重秩序穩定與履行岱頓協議的規範。中期目標為援助與改革為主，透過簽署穩定與連繫公約，推動各項改革並啟動入盟進程。長期目標為以入盟前準備工具為主，實踐多種族的共融的社會、和平地與鄰國合作與發展，以達到社會團結、反歧視、永續發展及良善治理的規範性權力。　　本文章節安排為第一章緒論、第二章歐盟規範性權力、第三章波黑的獨立發展、第四章波黑與國際社會、第五章歐盟規範性權力運用之檢視－以波黑為例與第六章結論。　　The main theme will be focus on, How the European Union(EU) apply the Normative Power Europe (NPE) on other states? The development of the European Community (EC) means the concept of the civilian power uprising. Balkan crisis, especially the civil war in Bosnia during 90s, stimulates the debate on the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) in 1992 and European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP) in 1999. Follwing the trendency more and more concern on the NPE. Via various declarations, policies, treatyies and conditions for accession candidate countries EU set up binding rules and principles for its member states, candidate and potential countries and third states. 　　The core definiation of NPE is peace, freedom, democracy and human right; broadly to speak could include. And NPE can also be more broadly to separate on social solidarity, anti-discrimiation, sustainable development and good governance. For candidate and potential countries Copenhagen criteria is required. 　　After signing the Dayton Peace Agreement (DPA) in 1995 for ending the civil war in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) the international community engaged active in BiH. According the DPA BiH constitute its constitution and political system: a federdation with three rotating presidents, three main ethic groups, three constitutions, two entities. Domestic environment is unstable and insecurity at the begin 1995, United Nations and NATO were first taken charge of stable and rebuild BiH. In 2002 EU is present till today with some policies and measures, such as EU special Representative (as a leading and bridging function), EU police Missions (to implace the civil task), EU force (act as military), and Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance(esp. financial aid). 　　This thesis will conclude that the external relation of EU is based on NPE. However NPE has only efficiency with its member states and states, which could be in the family of EU in the future. For rest states NPE will be respected only if not conter the national interest. Under the EU’s surveilien and assistance BiH, a potential candidate, must accordance the European standard, in this way NPE could be exercised.
Appears in Collections:	[歐洲研究所] 學位論文

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
index.html	0Kb	HTML	321	View/Open

Loading...