English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 51776/87004 (60%)
Visitors : 8385749      Online Users : 93
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/4410


    Title: 跨符號研究:「結構 / 行動」交相建構中的傳播巨型理論藍圖
    Other Titles: A Cross Symbol Study: The Blueprint of a Communication Grand Theory Through Inter-Construction between Structure/Action
    Authors: 趙雅麗
    Contributors: 淡江大學大眾傳播學系
    Keywords: 後設模式;後設論述;口述影像;科學傳播;跨符號傳播模式;傳播巨型理論;meta model;meta discourse;video description;science communication;cross-symbol model;communication grand theory
    Date: 2006-01-01
    Issue Date: 2009-03-19 13:48:05 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 臺北市:政治大學新聞系
    Abstract: 跨符號研究之「跨符號」一詞借自「跨文化」中的「跨越」語義意涵,旨在由不同符號體系間「意義如何轉換?」此一特殊命題出發,從不同符號體系間能否轉換、如何轉換的思考過程,去認識、辯證各個符號體系的自身本質,並由此過程「跨越」符號系統自身無法省察的認識侷限。本文指出,由跨符號研究所建構出的「跨符號傳播模式」包含兩個重要特質:第一是強調「結構∕行動」兩者間相互建構的本質,第二是強調「結構∕行動」兩者間相互認識的機制。而「跨符號傳播模式」更有兩層跨越意涵,一層藉由跨越不同符號體系間的比較,達成對各個符號體系更深入的認識,另一層則是強調在認識行為上,「結構∕行動」兩者相互建構與跨越的特質。以「跨符號傳播模式」作為傳播的思維肩架,不僅可完整融合傳播領域之「傳遞模式」(transmission model)與「組構模式」(constitutive model)兩種截然不同的傳播圖像,更可具體提供一個「後設論述」操作平台,作為傳播理論七大傳統彼此間的對話溝通機制,從中發展出傳播巨型理論的藍圖。
    The term “cross symbol” borrows from the “Cross Culture” study, implying to explore the specific proposition of how meaning is translated between different symbol systems, to recognize, discriminate, and authenticate the nature of each symbol system itself, and to cross the limitation that a symbol system is itself unable to be self-examined. This article points out the cross symbol model containing two significant features: first, to emphasize the nature of inter-construction between structure and action, and second, to stress the mechanism of mutual recognition between structure and action. The communication model of cross symbols also has another two-folded meaning: one is to deepen our recognition and understanding of each symbol system as well as to differentiate the differences among them by cross comparing different symbol systems, and the second is to emphasize the interrelated and inter-constructed nature between structure and action on the basis of epistemology. The term “cross symbol” borrows from the “Cross Culture” study, implying to explore the specific proposition of how meaning is translated between different symbol systems, to recognize, discriminate, and authenticate the nature of each symbol system itself, and to cross the limitation that a symbol system is itself unable to be self-examined. This article points out the cross symbol model containing two significant features: first, to emphasize the nature of inter-construction between structure and action, and second, to stress the mechanism of mutual recognition between structure and action. The communication model of cross symbols also has another two-folded meaning: one is to deepen our recognition and understanding of each symbol system as well as to differentiate the differences among them by cross comparing different symbol systems, and the second is to emphasize the interrelated and inter-constructed nature between structure and action on the basis of epistemology.
    Relation: 新聞學研究 86,頁 1-44
    Appears in Collections:[大眾傳播學系暨研究所] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    1016-1007_86p1-44.pdf474KbAdobe PDF361View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback