English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 49378/84106 (59%)
Visitors : 7371518      Online Users : 67
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/43831


    Title: V.F.埃恩與俄國思想家對全球性哲學的追尋
    Other Titles: Vladimir Ern and the Quest for a universal philosophy in Russia
    Authors: 馬良文;Maliavine, Vladimir
    Contributors: 淡江大學俄羅斯研究所
    Keywords: 俄羅斯思想;道理觀念;個性;歷史理論;Russian thought;Logos;orthodox spirituality;personalism;theory of history
    Date: 2001-09
    Issue Date: 2010-03-01 18:09:28 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 臺北縣:淡江大學
    Abstract: 作者主張重新評價以索洛維耶夫 (V.S.Soloviov) 為出發點的所謂新斯拉夫派思想。本文章的核心是此派主要代表V.F.埃恩的哲學遺產。V.F.埃恩(Vladimir F. Ern) 的作品在蘇俄受到忽視及禁止。V.F.埃恩使用基督教「Logos」(道理)的學說來激烈地批評西方理性主義的思維。不過,這種批評的基礎是系統的並且正面的哲學觀,他的目標是達到基督教全球性的哲學。V.F.埃恩思想基本的特點,第一,是「本體的」或者「全面的」知識;第二,是個性的創造意志理論;第三,是超歷史的或者「災難式進步」的概念。
    作者指出這三個題目內在的統一,並且總結V.F.埃恩的哲學立場能造成與東方傳統思想有許多接觸點的「另外一種哲學」的傳統。因此,對俄羅斯思想研究能夠對比較文明學做出相當重要的貢獻。
    The present article calls for a reappraisal of the Neo-Slavophile trend in Russian thought that evolved out of V. S. Soloviov’s philosophy. Its focus centers on the major representative of this tradition V. F. Ern (1882-1917). Largely neglected and virtually banned in Soviet Russia, Ern’s writings are remembered today mostly for their radical critique of Western rationalism in the name of the Christian concept of Logos. This critique is based on a systematic and positive philosophical outlook aimed at achieving a universal philosophic synthesis and serving as a justification of the Christian faith. It has for its foundations the theory of “ontological”, or integral, knowledge, a personalist anthropology of creative Will and the concept of meta-history or, as Ern referred to it, “catastrophic” history. The author discloses the inner consistency of these three main themes of Ern’s philosophy which constitutes, it is argued, a kind of “alternative” philosophical tradition having much in common with the great traditions of Oriental thought. Hence, the study of Russian “Slavophile” philosophy can render an important contribution to the comparative study of civilizations.
    Relation: 淡江人文社會學刊=TamKang journal of humanities and social sciences 8, pp.85-115
    Appears in Collections:[俄羅斯研究所] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    1029-8312_8p85-115.pdf195KbAdobe PDF156View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback