English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 60861/93527 (65%)
Visitors : 1496814      Online Users : 10
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/42746

    Title: A Retrospective and Prospective Overview of US-PRC-ROC Relations
    Authors: 陳一新;Chen, I-hsin
    Contributors: 淡江大學美國研究所
    Keywords: Public Goods;Quid Pro Quo;Responsible Stakeholder;Status Quo of Taiwan Strait;U.S.-China Strategic Dialogue
    Date: 2005-12
    Issue Date: 2010-03-01 16:40:49 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 臺北市:遠景基金會
    Abstract: Prior to the passage of Anti-Secession Law in China, the Bush administration’s position on that law was, interestingly, somewhat ambiguous and quite weak. Apparently, since then the U.S. policy toward China and Taiwan no longer remains on a balanced basis. On the other hand, Washington has requested Beijing to change many policies since the summer 2005, not only demanding China to take more responsibility in co-managing global affairs but also promoting the reform of China’s economic and domestic policies. While China does not think it should co-manage global affairs with the United States and other great powers, Beijing does not conceal its interest in co-managing Taiwan Strait affairs with Washington. During his trip to Asia, President George W. Bush simply wanted to assure that the largest say and dominant voice on the issue of Taiwan Strait remain with the United States, whereas China is reluctant to accept the U.S. dominant position. Given the fact that the U.S.-China-Taiwan
    relations have evolved since the turn of the century and that the U.S.
    policy toward China and Taiwan is no longer on a balanced basis, it
    would be prudent for Taiwan in this new era to develop a majority
    consensus in response to the post-Anti-Secession Law era.
    Relation: Views & Policies : Taiwan Forum 2(2), pp.1-35
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute of American Studies] Journal Article

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    1814-537x_2(2)p1-35.pdf311KbAdobe PDF345View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback