English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 53661/88287 (61%)
Visitors : 9915274      Online Users : 19
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    淡江大學機構典藏 > 體育事務處 > 期刊論文 >  Item 987654321/41731
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/41731


    Title: 海峽兩岸大專田徑運動成績之比較分析
    Other Titles: The comparison and analysis of collegiate track and field sports records between two sides of the strait
    Authors: 李昭慶;黃谷臣;陳逸政
    Contributors: 淡江大學體育室
    Keywords: 田徑運動;成績比較;Track & Field;Record Comparison
    Date: 1999-09-01
    Issue Date: 2010-01-28 10:12:14 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 中華民國體育學會
    Abstract: 本研究主要是以「1996年大陸第五屆大學生運動會」與「中華民國 85 年大專院校第二十八屆運動會」田徑比賽男、女生,甲、乙組各項決賽前六名的成績,比較兩岸大專院校田徑運動的成績表現,利用變異數分析,取得以下結果:一、大陸男乙組(相當朴中華民國甲組的體育院校或科系)在100M、200M、800M、1500M、5000M、110MH、4×100M 、鉛球、鐵餅、鏈球、撐竿跳高、三級跳遠等項目均優於中華民國男甲組,達P<.05水準。二、大陸男甲組(非體育院校或科系之學生)在100M、200M、400M、800M、1500M、5000M、10000M、3000M障礙、110MH、400MH、4×100M、4×400M、蛋合球、鐵餅、標槍、鏈球、撐竿跳高、劉匕遠、三級跳遠及十項運動等項目均優於中華民國男甲組,達P<.05水準。三、大陸女乙組(相當於中華民國甲組的體育院校或科系)在100M、200M、800M、1500M、5000M、10000M、100MH、400MH、4×100M、鉛球、鐵餅、標檢、跳高、跳遠、三級跳遠及七項運動等項目均優於中華民國女甲組,達P<.05水準。四、大陸女甲組(非體育院校或科系之學生)在100M、200M、400M、800M、1500M、5000M、10000M、100MH、400MH、4×100M、4×400M、鉛球、鐵餅、標槍、跳高、跳遠、三級跳遠及七項運動等項目優於中華民國女甲組,達P<.05水準。 This study is mainly to take the best six records in each of the man&apos;s and woman&apos;s final heat of track and field events of Group A and Group B respectively from the &quot;Mainland China 5th University Games&quot; and the &quot;Republic of China 28th College and University Games&quot; and to compare the performance of colleges and universities on both sides of the strait in track and field sports. By adopting variable analysis, the results are as follows: 1. Mainland group B man&apos;s team (equivalent to group A that is composed of Physical Education colleges and Physical Education departments in the Republic of China) performs better in 100m, 200m, 800m, 1500m, 5000m, liOm hurdle, 400m relay, shot put, discus, hammer throw, pole vault, and triple jump than the Republic of China Group A man&apos;s team, at a level of P<0.05. 2. Mainland Group A man’s team (none of Physical Education college and Physical Education department students) performs better in 100m, 200m, 400m, 800m, 1500m, 5000m, l0000m, 3000m steeplechase, 1 10m hurdle, 400m hurdle, 400m relay, 1600m relay, shot put, discus, javelin, hammer throw, pole vault , long jump, triple jump, and decathlon than the Republic of China Group A man&apos;s team, at a level of P<0.05. 3. Mainland Group B woman&apos;s team (equivalent to Group A that is composed of Physical Education colleges and Physical Education departments in the Republic of China) performs better in 100m, 200m, 800m, 1500m, l0000m, 100m hurdle, 400m hurdle, 400m relay, shot put, discus, javelin, high jump, long jump, triple jump and pentathlon & heptathlon than the Republic of China Group A woman&apos;s team, at a level of P<0.05. 4. Mainland Group A woman&apos;s team (none of Physical Education college and Physical Education department students) performs better in 100m, 200m, 400m, 800m, 1500m, 5000m, l0000m, 100m hurdle, 400m hurdle, 400m relay, 1600m relay, shot put, discus, javelin, high jump, long jump, triple jump, and pentathlon & heptathlon than the Republic of China Group A woman&apos;s team, at a level of P<0.05.
    Relation: 體育學報 27,頁 193-202
    DOI: 10.6222/pej.0027.199909.2221
    Appears in Collections:[體育事務處] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML48View/Open
    index.html館藏資訊0KbHTML49View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback