Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Concordance and Discrepancy between Electrodiagnosis and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Cervical Root Avulsion Injuries|
|Authors: ||Tsai, Po-yi;Chuang, Tien-yow;Cheng, Henrich;Wu, Hsiu-mei;張玉坤;Chang, Yue-cune;Wang, Chih-pin|
|Issue Date: ||2010-01-28 07:18:36 (UTC+8)|
|Publisher: ||Mary Ann Liebert|
|Abstract: ||To clarify the relationships between electromyography (EMG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), we compared findings in 37 selected patients who presented with cervical root avulsion injuries. Nerve root repair with C4-T1 hemilaminectomy was subsequently performed on 19 patients. The agreement between the two evaluative modalities with complete or incomplete lesions of ventral root and pre- or postganglionic lesions of dorsal root was measured for each root level. Both with ventral and dorsal root evaluation, C6, C7, and C8 yielded high agreement values, ranging from 86% to 94%. C5 manifested the lowest agreement values: 54% on ventral root assessment. Additionally, EMG, in comparison with MRI, revealed a higher quantity of implicated injured components. MRI, in turn, detected more lesion components than surgical exploration alone achieved. The capability of EMG to recognize axonotmesis leads to the discrepant findings between the two modalities. The visualization of mild neurotmesis by MRI, which cannot be achieved by surgical inspection, results in divergent findings between the two modalities. Both EMG and the MRI play crucial roles in preoperative assessment, and they may complement each other.|
|Relation: ||Journal of Neurotrauma 23, pp.1274-1281|
|Appears in Collections:||[數學學系暨研究所] 期刊論文|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.