English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 51258/86283 (59%)
Visitors : 8025732      Online Users : 76
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/34758


    Title: 自行車生活小區之營造 : 以臺北市中心為例
    Other Titles: Creation of a bicycle-life area : in case of downtown Taipei city
    Authors: 施養政;Shih, Yang-jheng
    Contributors: 淡江大學建築學系碩士班
    鄭晃二;Jeng, Hoang-ell
    Keywords: 自行車;自行車生活;自行車生活小區;臺北市;自行車友善城市;Bicycle;bicycle-life;bicycle-life area;Taipei;bicycle-friendly City
    Date: 2009
    Issue Date: 2010-01-11 05:34:40 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究目的旨在經由研究者本身即為自行車愛好者的騎乘經驗以及藉由荷蘭與其新興城鎮—豪頓在自行車發展計畫上的討論,來檢討臺北市當下發展「自行車生活化」議題所面臨到的問題。研究動機主要是當研究者長時間以自行車往返住家與臺北市後,發現到臺北市現今的自行車政策發展過於僵化,且仍依附於機動車輛為主的規劃觀念,以至於成果不能全然滿足自行車使用者在都市中騎乘的需求與期望。

    本研究架構可分為三個部份,首先藉由文獻分析與研究者的經驗歸納出,影響民眾在都市中騎乘自行車的因素主要可歸納為「安全」、「舒適」、「便利」三點,而逐一檢視後發現臺北市當下的各項發展均有所不足,故難以吸引民眾在都市中使用自行車。而後,由案例的討論發現到,荷蘭之所以能成功的推廣民眾使用自行車,主要為該國明確的將自行車作為交通政策的發展主軸以及在政策、經濟、社會文化與自然環境的優勢。將荷蘭的經驗與臺北相比即可發現,臺北市當下自行車政策執行時的癥結點即在於缺乏整體的規劃觀念以及多處於實驗性質的硬體建設,同時一般民眾對機動車輛的過度依賴更是關鍵問題所在。最後,以臺北市中心為基地進行實驗性的願景規劃與設計操作,並提出「自行車生活小區」之規劃概念,以供相關單位在未來發展自行車政策時新的思考方向與規劃方式。

    因此,本研究認為若要在臺北市真正實踐「自行車生活化」的目標,必須掌握以下幾個重點︰

    一、考量臺北市現有的大眾運輸系統站點分佈以及市民日常自行車旅次長度與習慣,以重新調整道路交通系統與日常生活圈範圍的方式,營造一個讓自行車使用者可以安全騎乘的「自行車生活小區」。

    二、自行車路網應與民眾日常生活中較常前往的公共場所或空間相連結,如學校、大眾運輸站點、公園等。並藉由設置轉運空間的策略,提供民眾便利且高效率的旅運方式。

    三、鼓勵企業與政府機關在工作場所以及公共空間中規劃盥洗空間,改善自行車使用者在騎乘過程後的舒適性。
    The purpose of this research is to review the problems faced by Taipei’s current bicycle-life development through the author’s personal experience as a bicycle lover and the discussion about bicycle development plans in the Netherlands and the municipality in the Netherlands, in the province of Utrecht – Houten. The primary research motivation came about when the researcher, who has long cycled between home and Taipei, discovered that the development of the city’s modern bicycle policy was overly rigid and still secondary to a planning concept centered around motor vehicles, resulting in the needs and expectations of city cyclists not being fully met.

    The structure of this research can be divided into three parts: First, according to literature analysis and the researcher’s experience, the three factors affecting city residents’ bicycle riding can be summarized as “safety,” “comfortability,” and “convenience.” After individual inspection, it is apparent that Taipei’s current developments are lacking in each factor, thus making it difficult to attract residents to ride their bikes in the city. Secondly, it was discovered through case discussion that the primary reason the Netherlands is able to successfully promote bicycle riding among citizens is that it has an advantageous policy, economy, social culture, and natural environment, and their government clearly places bicycles at the forefront of transportation development policy. Comparing the experience of the Netherlands and Taipei, it is apparent that the problem with Taipei’s current bicycle policy implementation lies within its lack of a comprehensive planning concept and its hardware construction being mostly in the experimental phase. At the same time, ordinary citizens’ over-reliance on motor vehicles is the root of the problem. Finally, experimental prospective planning and design operations are being implemented in downtown Taipei and put forward the concept of “bicycle-life area” to provide relevant organizations new ways of thought and methods of planning in future bicycle policy development.

    Therefore, this research concludes that if Taipei is to truly carry out the goal of “bicycle-integrated life,” it must grasp the following main points:
    1. Take into consideration the station distribution of Taipei’s mass transportation system and the length/habits of city residents’ daily bicycle rides, and build a “bicycle-life area” for cyclists to safely ride by re-adjusting the road transportation system and the boundaries of where daily life activities occur.

    2. The bicycle road network should be connected to public places and areas frequented by people in their daily lives, such as schools, mass transportation stations, parks, etc. Use the strategy of establishing transfer areas to supply people with convenient and highly effective travel methods.

    3. Encourage businesses and government organizations to plan restrooms in public areas and the workplace in order to improve the comfortability of cyclists after their ride.
    Appears in Collections:[建築學系暨研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    0KbUnknown257View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback