| 摘要: | 不同環境下產生的差異形成了地點的特徵，這之中包含著物質的與人文的特徵，構築的狀態，作為地景所呈現的表徵，及從地點文化至地點構築性的過程，作為本研究的討論目標。本研究特別對於地點的經驗與地點的描述以及面對在地的構築文化之間的關係加以思考。將設計視為論述的工具，而非一種終結，試圖以經驗地方的獨特性去理解構築文化的本質，討論未來以地域觀點所產生的構築方式或設計方法上的觀點。給予除了以地方文史觀點外，面對地點差異所形成在設計討論上的可能性。
本研究對於面對自我經驗、知識體系與地點連結的重要性，對於面對地點所作的辨證，成為設定研究流程的重要依據，並且將設計分為兩部分，第一是由地點目前的構築狀態與經驗作為觀察對象，以由下而上的方式理解地點構築工法；第二部分是抽離具有價值的元素，理解地點構築的發展價值與可能性，幫助設計對於論述的完成。
從原來對於地點共同元素與差異元素的質疑，到面對討論不同地點的差異性質，所相信的是場所的內在價值與地點的活動有著密切的關聯。對象的選擇則以土地發生密切關聯的農業地景來觀察構築著所面對環境與農業需求的協調與適應性，理解形成構築文化的價值。並對於這種在生產與構築行為在低技術的需求下，往往也讓構築與生產的行為成為同一件事，這種直接與間接對於兩著需求上的經驗回饋，成為面對農業地景構築上的重要意涵。
從五個方面對於在構築議題上的研究討論，分別對於材料使用的邏輯、設計方法上的經驗、地點活動觀察的互應與基地內在紋理的描述、構築物或構築群體在農業地景的生命價值、與設計作為整體論文推導過程，提出對於討論設計經驗上的一種操作，做為最後在面對本次研究的最終結論。
The differences made in different environments form the features of sites, in which it contains the features of materials and human cultures. The construction condition is taken as the surface feature shown by landscapes, and the process from site cultures to site construction is taken as the discussion target of this research. This research mainly focuses on the relationship between site experience, site description, and local techtonic cultures. Design is regarded as a tool of discussion instead of a kind of termination to realize the essence of techtonic cultures by experiencing local uniqueness, and discuss the concepts of construction methods and design methods produced by the regional concept in the future. This research provides the possibility of designing the discussion caused by the differences between different sites in addition to the concept of local literature and history.
This research takes the importance of facing self-experience, the knowledge system, and the connection between sites, and the recognition made when facing sites as the important basis of setting research process. This research divides the design into two parts: one is to take the current construction condition and experience of sites as the observed object and realize the site construction method via a bottom-up manner; and the other is to take out the important elements, realize the development value and possibility of site construction, and help complete the discussion for the construction of design.
From the doubt about common elements and different elements of sites in the beginning to the discussion on different qualities between different sites, this research believes that there is a close relationship between the internal value of places and the activities of sites. As to choosing the objects, this research takes the agricultural landscapes closely related to land to observe the coordination and adaptation of the environment and agriculture demand that constructors face to understand the value that forms the techtonic culture. As well as, construction and production usually becomes the same thing under the demand for low technique of production and construction activities, and the experience feedback of the direct and indirect demand for both also becomes an important meaning of the techtonic culture of agricultural landscapes.
The research and discussion on techtonic issues in the five aspects separately take the logic of using materials, the experience of design methods, the response of observing site activities and the context, the life value of construction objects or construction groups on agricultural landscapes, and design as the inference process of the whole thesis to propose a kind of operation of discussing design experience as the final conclusion of this research. |
