淡江大學機構典藏:Item 987654321/34714
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 62822/95882 (66%)
造訪人次 : 4018415      線上人數 : 977
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/34714


    題名: 非物質性材料構築 : 以寶特瓶為例
    其他題名: Tectonic of nonmaterial : study of plastic bottles
    作者: 林紓婷;Lin, Sue-ting
    貢獻者: 淡江大學建築學系碩士班
    吳光庭;Wu, Kwang-tyng
    關鍵詞: 聚對苯二甲酸乙二酯;寶特瓶;回收;再生;再利用;PET;plastic bottles;retrieve;renewable resource;reuse
    日期: 2009
    上傳時間: 2010-01-11 05:31:56 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 隨著時間的增加,綠色資源逐漸的被消耗殆盡,未來的我們即將進入一個資源匱乏的年代,在這之前,我們意識到問題的嚴重性,以各種方式來讓更多的人了解,我們已經不能再用相同的方式來過生活。這個年代即將進入磨合期,事實就是,你無法完全禁用某些不環保的素材,那些素材因為需要所以被製造出來,在找到更好的替代方案之前,它扎實的充斥在我們的食、衣、住、行當中。

    在台灣,最令人頭痛的垃圾問題就是塑膠PET,多數被用來製造寶特瓶居多,究竟是什麼原因使這些原本被人們需要東西,如此快的被冠上「垃圾」的名稱呢?「垃圾」一詞就是人為的劃分,「有用」及「沒用」的劃分,所以什麼東西是垃圾,什麼東西不是垃圾,它是沒有固定的界線,或許我們可以移動垃圾那條界線,將這些原本是垃圾的東西,延長它的使用需求,重中找出可置換的關係。就像食物鏈一樣,大魚吃小魚,小魚吃蝦米,每一個生物都是重要的鏈結,或許我們可以用此方法重新審視材料的鏈節,用最小的損害卻能提供最大的效益。

    本研究設定觀察範圍,針對1000毫升以下的寶特瓶,希望可以透過實驗及觀察從中找出其它可能性,運用寶特瓶本身的造型組構成單元,再利用單元組成一個面,甚至是一個體或是一個空間……等等的任何可能性,使寶特瓶回收後,不再只是再製成寶特瓶或是衣服,創造並延長寶特瓶的使用價值,使寶特瓶不是那麼快的淪為「沒有用的垃圾」。
    When time passes by, our natural resources are starting to be used up, and we will be stepping into a future with resource famine. Before all this happens, we have to sense the seriousness and use all different kinds of methods to let more people know that we can''t live the way we used to. We will be walking into an age of adaptation, in fact, you can not band all the materials which are non-recyclable, because there are still demands in them. Before find a better replacement method, it truly affects our food, clothing, housing and transportation.

    In Taiwan, the major waste problem is PET, it''s mostly use for making bottles. For what kind of reasons these things that were once needed by people are now being call "Trash"? "Trash", is a definition of "useful" and "useless", so what is defined as trash and what is not? There is no certain answer for them, although we can decide, decide on things that were trash, we extend its demand for uses, find some places which it can be a replacement for other things. Just like a food chain, big fishes eat little fishes, little fishes eat little shrimps, every kind of living being is important in this chain, maybe one day we can use this method to judge the use of our material chain, getting the best benefits with the smallest harms.

    This research observation range was based on the use of bottles below 1000ml. Hoping through testing and observations; we can find its possibilities, using the modeling of the bottle itself as unit, and combining all these units into a face, moreover a body or a space etc., any kind of possibilities. After the recycle of these bottles, it''s not only reused as bottles or clothing, it can create the extension of it''s value instead of "useless trash".
    顯示於類別:[建築學系暨研究所] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    0KbUnknown394檢視/開啟

    在機構典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

    TAIR相關文章

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - 回饋