English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 49645/84944 (58%)
Visitors : 7700103      Online Users : 96
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/34480


    Title: 學術書寫中的愛情知識建構─以社會科學學門的碩士論文為例
    Other Titles: The construction of love knowledge in academic writings : illustrated by dissertations of social sciences disciplines
    Authors: 王欣祺;Wang, Hsin-chi
    Contributors: 淡江大學大眾傳播學系碩士班
    紀慧君;Chi, Huei-chun
    Keywords: 學術書寫;學門;建構;知識/權力;社會互動;academic writing, discipline, construct, knowledge/power, social interaction
    Date: 2007
    Issue Date: 2010-01-11 05:18:30 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究關心的是,當愛情進入到學術書寫中會被型塑為什麼理性的樣貌,即我們關心研究者會使用怎樣的書寫模式來建構學術書寫的真實性。我們採用的理論視野是將學術書寫視為一種集體的社群合作。在這樣的問題意識之下,本研究選擇社會科學學門的碩士論文來分析論文的語言機制,我們欲了解研究者如何將自己的論文定位為一篇被學術社群認可的學術書寫,並建構了怎樣的愛情知識。

    本研究著重探討的是根據論文的三個部份,首先是問題意識,接著是學門傳統(理論與方法的使用),最後是研究者身分的建立。本研究將目前研究愛情的碩士論文區分為三種主要的書寫立場以進行分析,三種立場分別是:將書寫視為一種社會改革、將書寫視為一種客觀探測、將書寫視為一種人文關懷。

    從這三種立場的探究可知,研究者書寫愛情的過程包含整個學門的互動與合作,並且,愛情知識的生產涉及一種權力的運作。依此,我們不能不正視學門在生產知識上的權力關係。
    What the research concerns about the most in this research is what looks like when ‘love’ enter academic writing. We propose to analyze what writing ways researchers adopt to construct the reality of academic writing. This research applies the concept of collective interaction to analyze academic writing. As a result, we choose dissertations of social sciences disciplines to analyze the linguistic mechanism of those dissertations. The main purpose of this study is to analyze how the researcher positions himself and his dissertation to be accepted by the academic community and concern what love knowledge the researcher constructs.

    This study emphasizes on three sections in the dissertations:First, we analyze research questions. Second, we analyze the tradition of discipline(the adoption of theory and method).Third, we analyze the identity construction of the researcher. The research distinguishes three writing positions, including writing, as a social improvement, writing, as an objective exploration, writing, as a humane concern.

    This study examine three positions to distinguish the process of academic writing as a collective interaction .According to the result, the production of love knowledge infers that the academic writing covers ground power operation. We can not neglect the force the knowledge of academic writing.
    Appears in Collections:[大眾傳播學系暨研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    0KbUnknown256View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback