Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||從物理之學到性命之學 : 邵雍反觀思想析論|
|Other Titles: ||From the learning about physics to the learning about nature : on analyzing and discussing the theory of Shao Jung's observing things with things|
|Authors: ||陳雯津;Chen, Wen-jin|
|Keywords: ||物理之學;性命之學;觀;觀物;反觀思想;the Learning about Physics;the Learning about Nature;Viewing;Observing things;the Observing Things with Things theory|
|Issue Date: ||2010-01-11 05:14:31 (UTC+8)|
SONG SHI establishes the “Biographies of Daoxue” to recognize the scholars of Doaxue that accedes to the Confucianism, which is different from the past history books. In fact, SONG SHI has particular scholastic connection and historical condition; in another word, the official position of the Cheng-Zhu’s Neo-Confucianism in academic development of Yuan dynasty. Despite the scholarship of Shao-Jung is distinct to Cheng-Zhu’s Neo-Confucianism ,who is incorporated into the “Biographies of Daoxue” because of Cheng’s commendation that describes Shao-Jung’s learning is the study of inwardly a sage and outwardly a king. However, the question reveals supposed we compare the comments of the “Biographies of Confucian” that Zh-Cai Li endorses “The Learning about Physics” and “The Learning about Nature” to Shao-Jung. If Shao-Jung’s learning derives from Zh-Cai Li, then why can not he be a member of the “Biographies of Daoxue”? Instead, Zh-Cai Li attributes to the “Biographies of Confucian”. Obviously, it shows that “the Learning about Physics” and “the Learning about Nature” of Shao-Jung’s learning have already transformed. Then, what is its connotation? Does it correspond with Cheng’s apprehension of Shao-Jung’s learning is the study of inwardly a sage and outwardly a king? The study is beginning to the question of the Learning about Physics and the Learning about Nature of Shao-Jung’s implication whether it illuminates Cheng’s apprehension. Furthermore, it discusses the theory of Shao-Jung’s “Observing Things” and “Observing Things with Things” theory, from the concept of “Viewing” as an access.
Shao-Jung takes “Observing Things” as a theme to appear interpretation and application for the concept of “Viewing”. The concept of “Viewing” indicates inspection, cognizance, which also endorses the meaning of every thing, the Confucian value of pre-Chin and main cultivation of Daoism. In terms of this foundation, Shao-Jung expands Epistemology and the Mind-Nature-Cultivation theory for further development, by which constructs a unique knowledge that can communicate with talented humanity and all creatures. The “Observing Things” theory is a channel to understand cosmos, times, human-beings, and things from birth to development that is a drift of Epistemology. “The Observing Things with Things” theory as a device testifies how “Observing Things” realizes its way that is a characteristic of the Mind-Nature-Cultivation theory. In other words, The“ Observing Things” just as a hinge connect the Learning about Physics and the Learning about Nature. Meanwhile, Shao-Jung integrates The“ Observing Things with Things” theory into his life. It not only emerges his personal cultivation, but reflects his attitude to associate with people.
|Appears in Collections:||[中國文學學系暨研究所] 學位論文|
All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.